Catalytic link averts crisis
How an unexpected incident became an object lesson in emergency response. Nick Savvides reports.
Join RINA
Take 10 seconds to nominate a colleague, mentee or friend for our Forbes-style list. Must be under the age of 40 in 2026. Open to all maritime professions associated with naval architecture. See eligibility criteria. [hyperlinked].
"Ours is the generation facing challenges like decarbonization and autonomy. We don't have the solutions yet, but one thing is clear - collaboration will be key. At RINA, our mission is to advance top talent and create liquid networks between all maritime professions [hyperlink to 16 professions graphics] so interdisciplinary innovation can flourish."
Catriona Savage FREng, RINA President and BMT Programme Director
Join RINA
Renowned for the technical excellence of our events, publications and learning, we offer career pathways for naval architects and 16 associated professions [hyperlink to 16 professions].
We cover everything from super yachts and green propulsion to warship resilience. Network 1-2-1 with top talent at our events or influence the maritime industry by joining one of our comittees.
We promote the interdisciplinary conversation at the heart of maritime innovation. Speak at our events, publish in our journals or simply join the discussion forums on our website.
?? HOW?? FILL IN EMAIL HERE AND SIGN UP WITH 1 CLICK
How an unexpected incident became an object lesson in emergency response. Nick Savvides reports.
Jack Gifford MRINA on his journey from boatyard Saturday boy to a Caribbean future.
The Richard B Couch Model Basin at the University of Michigan College of Engineering, following completion of extensive renovations to the 750,000gallon, 360ft-long towing tank facility.
Aaron Cobb MRINA is chief engineer, international navy support, at BAE Systems, Maritime and Land Defence Solutions: vocational training was the basis for a fascinating and fulfilling career and it could be the pathway to success for many more young people.
ClassNK has issued an Approval in Principle (AiP) for a liquefied CO₂ carrier equipped with the Wind Challenger hard sail wind propulsion system.
John Jubb CEng, 94, on one of the most remarkable and troubling episodes in British maritime history in which he played a vital role.
The shift from heavy fuel oil to low-carbon alternatives promises deep emissions cuts but it also introduces a new generation of safety challenges. The challenge now is ensuring the industry meets its decarbonisation goals without compromising on safety.
Hydrogen is moving from pilot projects to mainstream maritime adoption, with landmark vessel orders and emerging bunkering hubs signalling growing industry confidence.
From flagship international conferences to specialist technical seminars, RINA events bring together experts, innovators, and professionals to share knowledge and shape the future of naval architecture.
Explore Upcoming Events
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
CLICK HERE
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
CLICK HERE














Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Shipbuilding has always absorbed the technologies of its era, from iron hulls to diesel propulsion to computer-aided design. The current transition is no different in kind, but it is different in scale. Digitalisation and artificial intelligence (AI) are not simply new tools added to an existing process, they are reshaping the logic of how vessels are conceived, built and operated. For shipyards that move quickly, the competitive implications are substantial.
Machine learning algorithms can evaluate thousands of hull configurations, propulsion options and internal layouts in the time it would take a design team to assess a handful. Predictive analytics can flag structural risks and schedule delays before they materialise on the shop floor. The effect is not just faster work, but qualitatively better decisions, made earlier, when they are still cheap to act on.
The design imperative
Design typically accounts for 5 to 10% of a vessel’s total production cost, yet that investment determines roughly 85% of final construction expenditure and conditions nearly 90% of operational performance across the vessel’s lifetime. The early decisions made regarding hull form, structural approach, propulsion and energy systems cascade through every subsequent phase. Getting them right is not merely a design office concern, it is the single greatest lever available to improve project economics.
Fragmented or linear workflows are no longer adequate to manage this responsibility. The interdependence between hull, structure, mechanical systems, piping and electrical architecture means that changes in one domain propagate unpredictably through others. AI-assisted integrated design environments address this directly: optimising weight distribution, identifying interference risks between components, and running multiphysics simulations that analyse several interacting physical phenomena simultaneously. Engineers can explore a far larger solution space in the concept phase, which is where that exploration has the highest return.
The traditional spiral design model, iterating sequentially through concept, preliminary and detailed phases, struggles to accommodate this level of interdisciplinary integration. A model-based approach, closer to the V-model used in other advanced engineering disciplines, better reflects how modern design actually works: in parallel, with continuous validation against requirements rather than staged handoffs.
![]() |
|---|
Digital twins across the lifecycle
The digital twin has become a central concept in next-generation shipbuilding, although its value depends entirely on how it is implemented. A static geometric model is not a digital twin in any meaningful sense. The useful version is a live, data-enriched representation of the vessel that is updated throughout its lifecycle, first with design and simulation data, then with construction data, and finally with operational data from IoT sensors monitoring systems at sea.
This continuous feedback loop changes the economics of both construction and operation. Validating vessel behaviour under a wide range of conditions before the first steel plate is cut reduces costly late-stage design changes. Once in service, condition-based monitoring and predictive maintenance strategies, driven by real-time sensor data, can extend equipment lifespan and reduce unplanned downtime. Crucially, the operational data also feeds back into future design processes, improving the accuracy of the models used on the next vessel.
Underpinning all of this is what practitioners call the digital thread: a single, authoritative data environment that consolidates mechanical, electrical, piping and structural design into one system. Global teams work from the same model regardless of location or time zone, eliminating the version-control failures and conflicting drawings that have historically generated rework. The digital thread does not just accelerate the process; it changes its error profile, removing entire categories of mistake.
AI in the shipyard
The application of AI extends well beyond the design office. On the production floor, AI-driven planning systems optimise construction sequences, predict schedule risk and identify inefficiencies before they compound. Computer vision algorithms inspect welds and component alignment in real time, catching defects that human inspectors may miss under production-line conditions and that, if left undetected, become exponentially more expensive to rectify.
The integration of machine learning into computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations is particularly significant. CFD has long been a bottleneck in hull optimisation, computationally expensive and therefore limited in how many alternatives a design team can practically evaluate. Machine-learning-accelerated CFD dramatically shortens computation times, allowing iterative hull form optimisation across resistance, energy efficiency and fuel consumption without proportionally increasing engineering cost.
Augmented and virtual reality tools are changing workforce training and assembly guidance. Rather than relying on paper drawings or static digital files, technicians can work with spatially accurate overlays that guide complex assembly tasks, reducing errors and accelerating the learning curve for less experienced workers. As yards compete for skilled labour in a tight market, these tools have operational as well as quality implications.
Challenges that remain
None of this is straightforward to implement. Technological interoperability, getting legacy systems, supplier data and new platforms to communicate cleanly, remains a significant operational headache. Initial investment costs are substantial and the return on investment, while real, is distributed over years rather than visible in a single project. Cybersecurity risks increase as shipyard infrastructure becomes more connected. And workforce transformation requires sustained investment in training that many yards have historically under-resourced.
Regulatory compliance adds another layer of complexity. IMO emission reduction targets – 70 to 80% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2040 and net zero by 2050 – create design requirements that did not exist a decade ago. Meeting those targets while managing cost and schedule pressure demands exactly the kind of multi-variable optimisation that AI tools are best suited to support. But it also requires regulatory frameworks to keep pace with the technologies being adopted, which is not always the case.
Product Lifecycle Management solutions have proven their value in managing the data complexity associated with these challenges. Yards that have centralised their data environments report improved resilience against supply chain disruptions, better customisation capability for client requirements, and more reliable planning processes. The pandemic-era supply chain failures accelerated adoption in a number of cases, demonstrating that digital integration is not just a competitive advantage but an operational necessity.
The direction of travel
The convergence of naval engineering and AI is not a future prospect – it is already visible in yards across Europe, Asia and the Americas. Digital twins are reducing construction time and cost. AI is cutting material waste and catching operational issues before delivery. Simulation tools are informing maintenance planning in military and commercial contexts alike. The technology is available; the differentiating variable is the organisational will and capability to deploy it effectively.
The next step in this evolution is the genuinely paperless vessel – not just a ship designed without drawings, but one operated and maintained through precise digital records, live system data and AI-supported decision-making throughout its service life. That is a more significant transformation than the industry has seen in generations, and the yards that position themselves for it now will have an advantage that compounds over time.
For naval architects, this shift redefines the scope of the discipline. The skills required to design a hull remain essential; the skills required to model its behaviour in a connected digital environment, and to interpret what that model tells you, are becoming equally so. The best engineering judgement has always been informed by the best available data. The change is that the data is now better, faster and more comprehensive than anything the industry has previously worked with.
This article appeared in Features, TNA Mar/Apr 2026
American shipbuilder Davie Defense has been awarded a contract by the United States Coast Guard to construct five Arctic Security Cutters (ASC), a new class of polar icebreaker intended to strengthen US presence in the High North. The award, announced in early 2026, forms part of a wider programme of up to 11 vessels authorised by Presidential Memorandum and represents one of the most significant US polar shipbuilding contracts in a generation.
The ASC is a substantial vessel: 99.9m in length, 21m in beam, displacing 9,000tonnes at normal operating draught of 7m. Ice Class PC3 rated, she is designed to maintain 3knots through 1.5m of ice. A diesel-electric propulsion system delivers 22MW of total installed power through two azimuth thrusters of 6.5MW each, supplemented by two 1.3MW bow thrusters, generating a bollard pull of 150tonnes.
Two independent engine rooms provide redundancy critical for operations in remote polar waters. Top speed is 16knots, with a range exceeding 6,500nm at 12knots in normal operating mode, extending beyond 12,000nm in high endurance configuration at deeper draught.
Endurance is up to 60 days, with accommodation for up to 124 crew and passengers. Mission payload capacity stands at 650m2 of covered and uncovered main deck space, capable of carrying up to 17 TEU, ground vehicles, unmanned systems and boats. The vessel also carries a helicopter platform and hangar sized for the MH-60 and UAVs.
The design draws on a proven platform with seven previous variants delivered from Helsinki Shipyard, accumulating a combined 85 years of winter operation in Arctic regions. One vessel from the existing fleet has transited the Northeast Passage unescorted in 8.5 days, a data point that speaks directly to the platform’s operational credibility in the conditions the Coast Guard requires.
The programme’s construction strategy is split across two countries. To meet the accelerated delivery schedule, the first two hulls will be built at Helsinki Shipyard in Finland, a sister facility within the UK-owned Inocea maritime group, targeting delivery of the inaugural vessel in 2028. The remaining three cutters will follow at Davie’s facilities in Galveston and Port Arthur, Texas, yards acquired from Gulf Copper & Manufacturing in 2025 and bringing over 75 years of Gulf Coast fabrication experience.
The rationale for opening the programme in Finland is that no active American yard has the icebreaker construction expertise needed to hit the schedule. The technology transfer dimension is therefore the most industrially significant aspect of the contract.
US shipbuilders will work alongside Helsinki’s specialists during the Finnish builds to develop the domestic competency needed for series production in Texas. It is an ambitious timeline, and whether Galveston and Port Arthur can absorb that knowledge base within the compressed window of the first two hulls will be the programme’s defining industrial challenge.
The strategic impetus is clear. Russia operates the world’s largest icebreaker fleet, including nuclear-powered vessels capable of year-round polar transit, while China has been steadily expanding its polar capabilities.
The United States has operated with a critically thin polar fleet for decades, and the Presidential Memorandum authorising the ASC programme reflects a belated but determined effort to address that deficit.
Davie Defense sits within Inocea, a privately held British marine industrial group with operations across the US, Canada and Finland. The Coast Guard’s decision to award to a group with operationally proven icebreaker heritage, rather than a domestic yard learning the discipline from scratch, reflects the urgency of the delivery timeline.
With Arctic competition intensifying and the Polar Security Cutter programme still unresolved, Washington needed a credible near-term answer. The ASC’s specifications and its platform’s track record suggest the design is capable of providing one. Whether the industrial strategy can match the vessel’s ambition will become clear as the first hull takes shape in Helsinki.
Kai Skvarla, CEO of Davie Defense, said: “We’re deeply honoured by this vote of confidence. We can’t wait to get started on delivering mission-ready cutters to our valued US Coast Guard partner. By anchoring construction in Texas, while drawing on Helsinki Shipyard’s proven icebreaker expertise, we can deliver the ASCs to meet the Coast Guard’s operational needs in the world’s harshest environments.”
This article appeared in In depth, TNA Mar/Apr 2026
| ARCTIC SECURITY CUTTER STATISTICS | |
|---|---|
| Length | 99.9m |
| Breadth | 21m |
| Draught | 6.5m-7.9m |
| Normal operation mode | 7m draught |
| High endurance/max cargo mode | 7.6m draught |
| Displacement | 9,000tonnes |
| Ice Class PC3 | 1.5m ice@3knots. Breaks ice 5ft thick @3knots ahead and astern |
| Speed | 16knots |
| Range | 6,500+nm @12knots, normal operational mode; 12,000+nm @12knots, high endurance mode |
| Endurance | up to 60days |
| Crew/PAX | max 124 |
| Machinery | Diesel-electric total installed power 22MW, two independant engine rooms |
| Propulsion | Azimuth thrusters (2x 6.5MW), bow thrusters (2x 1.3MW), bollard pull 150tonnes |
| Seakeeping | Roll reduction tanks for roll damping |
| Helicopter | Platform and hanger for MH-60 and UAVs |
| Mission payload capacity | 650m2 covered/uncovered main deck space; e.g. 17TEU, ground vehicles, UXVs, boats |
| Large deck cranes | Loading and unloading; launch and recovery |
| Enclosed reconfigurable mission space | e.g. for medical treatment, disaster relief, vehicle transport, special mission equipment |
There is a temptation, amid the complexity of global shipping regulation and the slow grind of intergovernmental negotiation, to conclude that the maritime sector’s decarbonisation agenda has stalled. That temptation should be firmly resisted. The wind has not gone out of the sails of maritime decarbonisation, and those who work in wind propulsion are among the clearest proof of it.
That was the central message I brought to the Wind Propulsion Conference, hosted jointly by the International Windship Association and the Royal Institution of Naval Architects in February. Speaking to an audience of naval architects, operators and technology developers, people who have committed careers and capital to the practical deployment of wind-assisted propulsion, I wanted to make one point above all others: progress continues, and we must maintain our course.
The IMO’s World Maritime Day theme for 2026 and 2027, ‘From Policy to Practice: Powering Maritime Excellence’, captures precisely the challenge and the opportunity. It is not enough to have agreed ambitious targets. The real work lies in turning collective regulatory decisions into real-world results that deliver tangible benefits for the sector and for the planet. No single organisation can do that alone. It requires administrations, classification societies, naval architects, shipowners, operators and individual mariners all pulling in the same direction.
Wind propulsion sits squarely within that ‘policy to practice’ agenda. It is a mature, cost-effective solution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping and, crucially, it is available today. Not in 10 years’ time. Not in five years. Now.
The regulatory framework that underpins this is already well established. For more than a decade, IMO has developed and strengthened a suite of energy efficiency standards – the Energy Efficiency Design Index, the Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index, the Carbon Intensity Indicator, and the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan – that have delivered concrete results.
Taken together, these measures have reduced the carbon intensity of international shipping by more than 38%, compared with 2008 levels. Ships today emit roughly 38% less CO₂ for the same transport work than they did at the start of this century. That is a significant achievement, and one that is too often overlooked in debate dominated by what remains to be done.
Market data reinforces the direction of travel. According to recent figures from Clarksons Research, nearly half the global fleet, 47% of world tonnage, is now fitted with at least one energy-saving technology. The trend towards further uptake is clear and accelerating. Wind propulsion technologies are part of that picture, and the industry’s investment in them continues to grow.
I must be clear on one point: IMO is technology neutral. The Secretariat does not promote or discourage any particular solution. There is no silver bullet and no one-size-fits-all pathway. Multiple routes to decarbonisation will coexist, and that is as it should be. What the regulatory framework must do, and what it is actively being designed to do, is ensure that all fuels and technologies are treated fairly and consistently, based on their well-to-wake emissions.
This is where wind propulsion faces both an opportunity and a challenge. In January 2026, the IMO’s Sub-Committee on Ship Design and Construction developed a draft safety workplan for greenhouse gas-reducing technologies, explicitly including wind propulsion. That workplan will go to the Maritime Safety Committee for approval in May 2026. It marks an important step: the formal integration of wind technologies into IMO’s safety framework, providing the regulatory clarity that owners and operators need to invest with confidence.
![]() |
|---|
On the regulatory horizon, the picture is more complex. Discussions on the next set of measures under the IMO Net-Zero Framework were adjourned last October. This was not a retreat from ambition. The commitment among Member States and industry to global regulation remains strong. But it created additional time, and that time is being used. MEPC 84, scheduled for April 2026, will continue discussions on the way forward, including the greenhouse gas fuel intensity (GFI) reduction requirements that will form the core of the next regulatory package.
Within that work, the development of GFI Calculation Guidelines is giving due consideration to the inclusion and fair treatment of wind propulsion, a recognition that its contribution to fuel saving must be properly accounted for if owners are to have the certainty they need. Contributions from the International Windship Association have been genuinely valuable here, helping to shape how the GFI will function in practice. That kind of direct industry engagement with the regulatory process is exactly what is needed.
Yet there is a shadow over the progress. Despite the improvement in carbon intensity, total fuel consumption by ships has remained broadly stable in recent years. Absolute greenhouse gas emissions have not yet declined significantly. Efficiency gains are being absorbed by growth in trade and fleet size. This is why the next regulatory package matters so much, and why inaction is not an option.
For naval architects and marine engineers, the message is one of both validation and urgency. The technologies you design, specify and integrate are not peripheral to the decarbonisation agenda, they are central to it. Wind propulsion, in particular, offers something rare in the energy transition: a proven, scalable, fuel-free reduction in emissions that can be retrofitted to existing vessels and designed into new ones. The regulatory framework is catching up. The market is moving. The only question is pace.
There may be diplomatic storms to navigate and regulatory mechanisms to refine, but the direction is set. We must maintain our course. The wind is with us.
This article appeared in Features, TNA Mar/Apr 2026
Hanwha Ocean is embedding its shipbuilding expertise directly into Canadian industry. The South Korean shipbuilder has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Ontario Shipyards and a trilateral Letter of Intent (LoI) with Ontario Shipyards and Mohawk College, establishing a technology transfer, industrial modernisation and workforce development framework in the Great Lakes region. The move is part of an effort to position itself for the Canadian Patrol Submarine Project (CPSP), one of the most consequential naval procurement decisions in Canadian history.
The CPSP aims to replace the Royal Canadian Navy’s ageing Victoria-class submarines with up to 12 modern vessels. Hanwha’s proposed platform is the KSS-III, a conventionally powered submarine designed for long-range operations and sustained presence at sea, including in Arctic environments, with a mature, production-ready design and lithium-ion propulsion.
The lithium-ion battery system offers significantly higher energy density than traditional lead-acid batteries. Combined with a fuel cell-based Air Independent Propulsion system, this advanced configuration enables the submarine to remain submerged for extended periods and sustain maximum underwater speed up to three times longer than submarines using lead-acid batteries. This system has enabled the KSS-III to set a world record for the longest continuous underwater operation by a conventional submarine. In addition, lithium-ion batteries provide longer life cycles and simplified maintenance, lowering both operational and sustainment costs.
Hanwha Ocean claims the programme would generate 200,000 job-years over 15 years and support approximately 15,000 jobs per year on average across a pan-Canadian industrial alliance of more than 100 companies.
![]() |
![]() |
|---|
The bilateral MoU commits Hanwha Ocean to structured technical and operational support across design and engineering, production planning, construction sequencing, quality management and smart-yard best practices. A near-term proof-of-concept is built into the agreement: Hanwha Ocean will support the design and construction of a training and recruitment vessel that Ontario Shipyards will begin building in 2026, providing a live demonstration of the partnership’s industrial intent rather than relying on declarations alone.
Workforce development will be addressed through the trilateral LOI, which establishes an embedded training hub at Ontario Shipyards’ Hamilton facility in partnership with Mohawk College. The college will lead programming across welding, electrical trades, marine mechanics, robotics and non-destructive evaluation. It is a curriculum mapped directly onto the skilled trades shortfall that has constrained Canadian shipbuilding for years.
Apprenticeship pathways will be integrated with production schedules, with applied research in automation and digital manufacturing on the agenda too. Hanwha Ocean will contribute technical advisory support and access to its global industrial networks to align training with international standards.
Both documents contain conditional language tying further Hanwha investment, including a dedicated training centre and expanded supply chain engagement, to the award of the CPSP contract.
![]() |
|---|
Hanwha has been active across Canada, with Quebec’s minister of international relations, Christopher Skeete, visiting the Geoje shipyard in February, and Canadian yard leaders separately touring the facility to discuss collaboration and MRO opportunities. Hanwha’s Geoje shipyard covers 5km2, employs more than 31,000 people and has delivered more than 1,400 vessels since 1973, including submarines and surface combatants for the Republic of Korea Navy.
Ontario Shipyards, the largest ship repair and construction company on the Great Lakes, now has facilities at Hamilton, Port Weller and Thunder Bay.
The combination of Hanwha’s production systems and Ontario’s existing infrastructure represents a credible industrial base, although execution of the knowledge transfer at the pace and depth the CPSP would require remains the programme’s defining test.
This article appeared in In depth, TNA Mar/Apr 2026
Lloyd’s Register (LR) has verified the sea trials performance assessment methodology used by GT Wings for its AirWing Jet Sail system. This provides an independent stamp of approval for the way the company measures fuel and emissions savings from its wind-assisted propulsion technology.
Announced at RINA’s Wind Propulsion Conference, the verification follows nearly 10 months of commercial operation of a 20m AirWing unit onboard Vectis Progress, a general cargo vessel operated by Carisbrooke Shipping. Installed in March 2025, the system has accumulated service experience across various routes and conditions, including North Atlantic winter passages, Great Lakes transits and Caribbean voyages.
Lloyd’s Register confirmed that GT Wings’ methodology aligns with recognised industry standards, including ISO 19030, and ITTC performance analysis practices, and that the approach used to isolate and quantify wind propulsion benefits is technically sound for in-service evaluation.
Andrew Hurford, senior specialist at Lloyd’s Register, said that independent verification of such methodologies is essential to building confidence in emerging maritime technologies.
As wind-assisted propulsion moves towards broader commercial adoption, the ability to demonstrate performance through independently verified, standardised methods is increasingly important for shipowners, charterers and project financiers weighing the business case for such systems. GT Wings said that data collection and analysis from Vectis Progress will continue as part of its ongoing validation programme.
Liam Campbell, chief commercial officer at GT Wings, said: “From the start, our vision has been to drive the transition through measurable, data‐driven performance. Lloyd’s Register’s verification confirms our alignment with international standards and validates that our performance predictions are grounded in real‐world evidence. It is an important step toward scaling wind‐assisted propulsion across global shipping and strengthening confidence in this technology as a viable pathway to reducing carbon emissions.”
This article appeared in News, TNA Mar/Apr 2026
The Grimaldi Group has taken delivery of Grande Michigan, the eighth ammonia-ready pure car and truck carrier (PCTC) in its fleet, from China Merchants Heavy Industries Jiangsu. Built to 220m in length with a beam of 38m, a gross tonnage of 93,145 and a service speed of 18knots, the vessel continues a fleet renewal programme that has established Grimaldi as one of the more technically progressive operators in the automotive shipping sector.
Across its 14 decks, Grande Michigan has a maximum capacity of 9,000 car equivalent units, with stowage arrangements capable of accommodating battery electric vehicles alongside those running on conventional fuels, a flexibility that has become a commercial requirement as the automotive sector’s transition to electrification continues at uneven pace across different markets.
The vessel is fitted with a gate rudder, a configuration first introduced to the PCTC sector on Grande Shanghai, the lead vessel of this series, delivered in July 2025, and now standard across the class. Developed originally by Kuribayashi Steamship in Japan and licensed globally by Wärtsilä, the arrangement positions two foil-shaped blades symmetrically either side of the propeller centreline. It functions simultaneously as a post-swirl energy recovery device, capturing rotational energy from the propeller slipstream that would otherwise be lost, and as a conventional steering system, with the claimed benefit of improved low-speed manoeuvrability at the automotive terminals at which the vessel will regularly call.
Grimaldi claims a 50% reduction in fuel consumption compared with earlier-generation car carriers, attributing the figure to a package of efficiency measures. These include an air lubrication system reducing frictional resistance at the hull-water interface, a silicone-based foul-release hull coating, and 2,500m2 of solar panels across the upper decks. Smart building management systems govern ventilation and air conditioning loads to reduce hotel power demand. The 50% figure is presented without a defined baseline vessel or operational condition and should be read as a comparative design estimate rather than a demonstrated in-service figure.
The main engine is electronically controlled and fitted with an exhaust gas cleaning system to limit sulphur oxide and particulate matter output. Selective catalytic reduction maintains nitrogen oxide emissions below IMO Tier III limits.
A lithium-ion battery energy storage system with a combined capacity of 5MWh supports onboard power management. The vessel is also fitted for cold ironing, enabling zero-emission port operations wherever shore power infrastructure is available, a capability of growing relevance as EU regulations extend onshore power supply obligations at European terminals.
Grande Michigan has received the Ammonia Ready notation from Italian classification society RINA, confirming that her structural arrangements, piping routing, ventilation provisions, and safety systems have been designed to facilitate future conversion to ammonia-fuelled propulsion without major structural intervention. The notation reflects the industry’s broader effort to preserve conversion optionality on newbuilds, given the current immaturity of ammonia bunkering infrastructure and the unresolved challenges surrounding the fuel’s toxicity in a shipboard environment.
Additional RINA notations include Green Plus, Green Star 3, Comfort Vibration, and Comfort Noise Port. The Comfort notations address habitability standards, a consideration of some weight on a vessel that will operate on a continuous deep-sea rotation.
Grande Michigan departed on her maiden voyage from Taicang, China, the commercial loading port proximate to the CMHI Jiangsu yard, carrying more than 7,000 cars and vans alongside more than 100 rolling units including heavy vehicles, MAFI trailers, and project cargo, bound for Mediterranean ports on Grimaldi’s Asia–Europe service.
The delivery extends a newbuild programme that has seen Grimaldi take eight ammonia-ready PCTCs in relatively quick succession. Whether the efficiency package’s cumulative gains can be validated under operational conditions across varied load factors and seasonal routing will be of material interest to competitors and the wider automotive logistics market.
This article appeared in News, TNA Mar/Apr 2026
Wärtsilä Gas Solutions has been awarded a contract to supply cargo handling and fuel gas supply systems for two new LNG bunkering vessels currently under construction at Zhejiang Xinle Shipbuilding in China.
The vessels, each with a capacity of 20,000m³, will be owned by a Hong Kong-based shipowner. The order was booked in Q4 2025 and reinforces Wärtsilä Gas Solutions’ position as a leading systems integrator for small-scale LNG applications.
The contract covers a comprehensive systems package including LNG cargo handling and fuel gas supply equipment, full system engineering and design, and integrated control and monitoring of all cargo handling operations. This level of systems integration is critical in bunkering vessel design, where operational reliability and safety margins are paramount.
“The use of LNG is key in enabling a green shipping future,” said Barry Yang, general manager of sales China at Wärtsilä Gas Solutions, adding that the systems offer a flexible and proven solution supporting operational efficiency for vessels bunkering LNG-fuelled ships.
The vessels will fill an increasingly important role in the marine energy transition. LNG continues to be adopted as a bridging fuel between conventional diesel and future zero-carbon alternatives, driving demand for purpose-built bunkering infrastructure.
Equipment delivery to the Zhejiang Xinle yard is scheduled to commence in Q4 2026, with both vessels expected to enter service during the latter half of 2027.
The number of LNG-fuelled ships in operation doubled between 2021 and 2024, with a record number of deliveries (169) in 2024, according to DNV, a Norway-based independent assurance and risk management provider. By the end of last year, 641 LNG-powered ships were in operation. According to the orderbook, this number is expected to double by the end of the decade.
While the bunkering infrastructure for some alternative fuels remains underdeveloped, DNV said LNG bunkering is maturing, adding that the significant gap between LNG bunkering supply and demand is expected to widen over the next five years based on the orderbook.
This article appeared in News, TNA Mar/Apr 2026
The UK’s Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB) has appointed Rob Loder as its new chief inspector of marine accidents, succeeding Andrew Moll OBE, who retired earlier this month after 21 years at the organisation.
Loder’s career began at sea: after training in heavy engineering ashore, he joined the Merchant Navy, completed a rating to officer conversion course, and rose to chief engineer across a varied fleet, including oil tankers, cable ships, ferries and superyachts. He subsequently moved into fleet management, ship repair, ship build supervision and project management before a period of industry consultancy.
His experience spans design-adjacent disciplines such as ship-build supervision and project management alongside deep operational knowledge. Loder joined MAIB in 2020 as an inspector, progressing to principal inspector and then deputy chief inspector before his current appointment. He is a chartered engineer, marine engineer and Fellow of IMarEST.
![]() |
|---|
Headquartered in Southampton, MAIB was established in 1989 following a recommendation from the public inquiry into the Herald of Free Enterprise disaster in 1987, when a ro-ro passenger ferry capsized off Zeebrugge with the loss of 193 lives. It is authorised to investigate all maritime accidents in UK waters and accidents involving UK-registered ships worldwide.
In 2024, MAIB recorded 1,631 reports of accidents involving UK vessels worldwide or vessels within UK coastal waters, with 1,753 vessels involved.
Loder said: “Working alongside the outstanding MAIB team, I am committed to ensuring our work continues to drive meaningful improvements in safety across the maritime sector.”
This article appeared in News, TNA Mar/Apr 2026
Ocean transportation company Sallaum Lines has shifted toward ordering LNG newbuilds, following initial reliance on second-hand vessels for its PCTC fleet, as part of an ambitious goal to achieve net-zero operational emissions by 2050.
“The decision to order newbuilds was driven by technical and environmental performance objectives, not by cost alone,” Charbel Khoueiry, maritime sustainability manager, says. “Sallaum Lines required vessels that could fully comply with IMO Tier III, the IGF Code, EEDI Phase 3 and forthcoming CII targets, while integrating dual-fuel LNG propulsion, electric vehicle-ready cargo decks and advanced hydrodynamic features.
“These parameters would have been impossible to achieve through retrofit without extensive structural and machinery compromises. Newbuilds designed from the keel up provide optimised hull efficiency, lower emissions and long-term lifecycle compliance with current and anticipated regulations.”
Consequently, Sallaum Lines is adding six large, dual-fuel LNG PCTC newbuilds to its fleet. The first duo in the series – the 199.9m, Ocean Breeze and Ocean Explorer – were designed by Shanghai Merchant Ship Design & Research Institute (SDARI) and constructed by Fujian Mawei Shipyard, with Ocean Breeze delivered in Q3 2025 and Ocean Explorer scheduled for delivery in Q1 2026. A further four PCTCs, designed by Deltamarin are currently under construction at China Merchants Heavy Industries (CMHI) and scheduled for delivery throughout 2026-2027.
Ocean Breeze runs on LNG, MGO and VLSFO, and can operate in LNG-only, fuel oil-only or dual-fuel modes, depending on prevailing voyage or port conditions. Khoueiry explains: “We selected LNG because it offers a proven, commercially available and technically mature, low-emission pathway that complies with current environmental regulations. It eliminates SOx and PM, reduces NOx by up to 80% through exhaust gas recirculation [EGR] and lowers CO2 by approximately 20–25%.”
At a continuous sailing speed of 17knots, the vessel is estimated to achieve a range of approximately 12,600nm when operating on LNG, 3,000nm on MGO and 7,800nm on VLSFO. Taken together, the vessel’s total potential sailing range with full tank capacity is approximately 23,400nm.
The powertrain aboard Ocean Breeze incorporates a MAN B&W main engine, rated 12,614kW at 99rpm, and three auxiliary Wärtsilä 9L20DF engines, rated 1,613kW apiece, in addition to a 200kW emergency generator. “All machinery is installed in an aft engine room with segregated LNG and ventilation spaces, in accordance with the IGF Code and ABS requirements,” says Khoueiry.
The ship is also fitted with two Type C LNG storage tanks, each featuring the capacity for about 1,768m3 of LNG.
LNG is vaporised and supplied to the engines via a dual-pressure fuel gas supply arrangement, providing high-pressure gas at approximately 315bar to the main engine and low-pressure gas to the dual-fuel generator engines.
The PCTC is equipped with a single fixed-pitch propeller and a semi-balanced twisted rudder with bulb, developed by SDARI to enhance propulsive efficiency. The vessel is designed for a service speed of 18.5knots at design draught, allowing for a 15% sea margin.
The ship was classed by ABS, achieving full IGF, ENVIRO and operational notations. “Safety features include gas-tight LNG spaces, independent ventilation, double-walled gas piping, ESD systems, CO₂ fire protection and EV fire zones with continuous detection for the hydrogen/CNG vehicle areas,” says Khoueiry. This was accompanied by crew training in LNG handling, carried out in line with IMO/IGF Code competence standards.
As another green bonus, the ship has been treated with Chugoku Marine Paints’ SEAFLO NEO SLZ low-friction antifouling coating, developed to keep the hull continuously smooth, reducing hydrodynamic drag and fuel consumption and enabling higher vessel speeds.
After decades of building purpose-designed and built ships that sometimes failed to meet requirements and often experienced significant cost overruns, the US Navy is pioneering a new approach to shipbuilding with its Landing Ship Medium (LSM) programme, an approach it hopes will enable it to quickly bring large numbers of newbuilds into service on time and on budget.
US Navy secretary John Phelan said the new approach adopted for the LSM procurement would be based on a “non-developmental design” that will not require significant adaptation.
The design selected by the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), Damen Shipyards Group’s LST100, has already been adopted by the Royal Australian Navy, for whom eight examples will be built in Australian yards, and will, said the Naval Sea Systems Command, “enable rapid fielding of this urgently needed capability… and shorten acquisition timelines”.
The LST100 was selected after a ‘side-by-side’ analysis of existing designs that had the potential to meet the LSM requirement. NAVSEA’s analysis of the designs was informed by technical data packages, augmented by hands-on ship visits. Up to 35 LSMs will now be built at US yards that will compete with one another for contracts to build the landing ships.
Speaking at the time that selection of the Damen design was announced, chief of naval operations Admiral Daryl Caudle said: “A year ago, the US Navy cancelled the LSM request for proposals, when the conceptual design produced bids that were simply unaffordable. We applied common sense, went back to basics, and reassessed the programme.
“We identified existing, proven designs that meet the concept of operations requirements, and then scrutinised them for producibility.”
Secretary Phelan said with the LSM decision the US Navy is “fundamentally reshaping how the Navy builds and fields its fleet”, making what he called an “operationally driven and fiscally disciplined choice”. He said with the LSM the US Navy has – for the first time – adopted what he described as a “build to print approach” that drives down cost, schedule and technical risks.
Commandant of the Marine Corps General Eric Smith said: “For the Marine Corps, the LST100 will provide an organic littoral capability in the Indo Pacific and around the world. It will provide us with a critical, inter-theatre manoeuvre asset that is able to embark and transport marines, weapons, supplies and equipment, without requiring access to a pier.”
The Secretary of the Navy described the LST100 as a 4,000tonne design, with a range of more than 3,400nm “that gives us the right balance of affordability, capability and speed”. General Smith said the LST 100’s cargo capacity, helicopter capacity and crane “make it an excellent choice for the Marine Corps’ requirement of no less than 35 medium landing ships to support naval expeditionary forces.”
Admiral Caudle said the US Navy “is incorporating a disciplined set of class standard equipment, so that the ships will be maintainable, repairable and able to meet operational availability targets”.
In July 2025, Damen received a technical data package award from NAVSEA for the LST100, and that design has now been selected as the basis for the LSM, all of which will be constructed at American yards.
The Dutch company describes the LST100 as 100.68m in length with a beam of 16m and a draught of 3.58m. Able to support a wide range of operations, with the ability to transport personnel, vehicles, equipment and cargo, the design has accommodation for 282 Marine Corps personnel.
The vessel can transit at speeds of up to 14knots, with an endurance speed of 10knots, and a range of up to 7,530nm. The LST100 is also a highly flexible unit, with a modular design that enables straightforward adaptation and upgrade without compromising the benefits of standardisation.
December 2025 saw Belgian shipowner Somtrans christen its latest delivery, the estuary-class bunker barge United LNG I, in a ceremony hosted at the Port of Antwerp. The family-run company plans to put the barge into service in February 2026, where it will be used to fulfil growing demand for LNG bunkering in various Belgian and Dutch seaports, a spokesperson for Somtrans confirms.
The 135m x 21.46m vessel has been designed for both inland waterways and coastal service up to the Port of Zeebrugge. The barge’s construction was an international affair: the hull was built in China and then transported to the Netherlands for outfitting. Here, RensenDriessen, a shipyard-independent, Dutch newbuild projects specialist, acted as the main contractor, with Heusden-based TeamCo Shipyard overseeing tank integration, engineering and final outfitting of the vessel.
Italian engineering firm Gas and Heat, which specialises in designing and building cryogenic tank systems and LNG-fuel supply systems for maritime applications, supplied the barge’s eight cylindrical, single-walled Type C LNG tanks. Each LNG tank features a capacity of 1,000m3 and has been engineered to store this alt-fuel at -165°C, and with a boil-off rate of 0.30% per day.
The tanks are pressure-rated 400kPa. According to Somtrans, the tanks will remain closed during operations, monitored by pressure and temperature sensors, and will only require direct internal checks during the barge’s five-year class inspections. The vessel’s eight cargo pumps are each rated 165m3 per hour. The barge’s LNG bunker arm measures 25m in length and has a capacity of 920m3 per hour.
Somtrans says that the completion of United LNG I ndicates how the model of hull construction in China, followed by final outfitting in Western Europe, is becoming increasingly common in European shortsea shipping.
Wim Driessen, MD of RensenDriessen, comments: “By combining efficient hull construction in China with local outfitting in Western Europe, we are now offering our hull-building expertise more widely to the shortsea shipping segment. These cylindrical LNG tanks take this project into new territory: integrating them at this scale is unique. It shows what is possible when a shipowner, contractor and yard work as one team.” TeamCo Shipyard MD Marcel Zweers adds: “This was not a standard build. The LNG systems, the tank integration, the bunkering equipment, all demanded precision.”
United LNG I features a moulded depth of 7.5m and a draught of approximately 4m, and is arranged to accommodate a crew of six. Onboard tank capacities include: 5,113m3 of ballast water; 30m3 of fresh water; and approximately 39.7m3 of fuel oil, split between one fore tank (1.7m3) and two aft tanks (19m3 each). This latter arrangement reflects the positioning of the engines, which include four MAN Rollo LNG models, each rated 525kW, at the fore of the vessel and two 800kW diesel generators and a single 117kW auxiliary diesel generator at its aft. The barge also carries two battery packs, each rated 200kWh.
Propulsion-wise, the barge incorporates two main azimuth thrusters, rated 1,305kW apiece and featuring propeller diameters of 1,900mm. These are complemented by a pair of 550kW bow thrusters.
Somtrans is now expecting delivery of a second sister barge, also under build at TeamCo Shipyard, aligned to plans to extend its bunkering capacity within the Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) region. “This comes as LNG bunker demand in Northwest Europe continues to expand, driven by new dual-fuel tonnage in the container, tanker, bulk, ro-ro and cruise segments,” the Somtrans spokesperson explains. “The global fleet of LNG-fuelled vessels continues to grow by double digits each year, driven by owners seeking cleaner operations and reliable access to alternative fuels.”
TeamCo Shipyard’s Zweers says that outfitting of the forthcoming sister, United LNG II, will commence in March 2026.
Already under construction at Manor Marine, with a scheduled launch date of June 2026, the first Oceanus17 will “have a flavour of the military about it, but be very much a dual-role vessel,” Matthew Ratsey, founder and MD of ZeroUSV, says. “The feedback we’re getting from wind farm service operators is that they want to increasingly use remote-operated vehicles [ROVs], and the Oceanus17 can function as a ‘mothership’ to launch and recover ROVs, and as a ‘comms node’, tracking the ROVs’ positions when they are deployed – which has massive benefits in not losing a single ROV.”
Ratsey adds that ZeroUSV was recently approached by a company that manages the offshore facilities for several energy majors, with a view to using a fleet of USVs to deliver post and spares to these sites, as a cost-efficient alternative to expensive helicopter hire. This is a task the forthcoming Oceanus17 could easily handle given its aft deck payload capacity of 4tonnes, Ratsey points out.
Oceanus17 will comprise an all-aluminium, 16.97m x 3.17m monohull with the ability to maintain range for more than 50 days.
One of ZeroUSV’s goals was to “compress traditional defence acquisition timelines”, where the journey from design to prototype can roll on for years, Ratsey notes. So, for the Oceanus17, ZeroUSV chose to use a ‘spiral development process’, accelerating the design, engineering and build phase by basing the new model heavily on the Oceanus12 – essentially treating the existing USV as a ‘building block’ for the newer, bigger model.
Ratsey elaborates: “We’ve taken most of the core engineering we used for the Oceanus12 – what we know works and is reliable – and asked ourselves, what is the biggest vessel we can build with this engineering package? This includes the engines, the batteries, the battery chargers and the generators used in the Oceanus12 – we designed enough capacity into those components the first time around, we can reuse them in the Oceanus17.”
Another benefit of the spiral development process is that, by using the same components as the Oceanus12, end users can utilise the same spares packages with the newer model. USV familiarisation is another bonus. The biggest boon, though, from a USV manufacturer’s perspective, is perhaps the ability to speed up necessary certification. Ratsey explains: “The fact that we’re using 95% of the same equipment from the Oceanus12 on the Oceanus17 means that, when we come to enter the Maritime and Coastguard Agency [MCA] Workboat Code 3 process, all our current mitigations and submissions are transferrable – they just apply to a slightly larger version of the vessel.”
The Oceanus17’s payload bay will measure 9m x 2.8m, and will have the capacity to accommodate a 20’ container, with power and data connection points. The USV will also feature Starlink and Iridium connectivity and will incorporate an autonomous software package provided by ZeroUSV’s long-term partner Marine AI – rated to level 4 autonomy, but future-proofed for further upgrades. In addition to the boat’s primary sensors, customers will be able to select FLIR thermal IP cameras and W-band HD radar, among other options.
While Manor Marine puts the USV together, working with materials and components pre-issued by ZeroUSV, an independent contractor will oversee the boat’s electrical fit-out. If all goes to plan, the Oceanus17 will be launched in time for this year’s Seawork expo, to be hosted in Southampton, UK between 9-11 June. Then, in July, the boat will be certified by MECAL to meet the MCA Workboat Code 3, Annex II requirements for uncrewed vessels and unlimited operations.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
text one
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
When class surveyor Panagiotis Katsinellos began a routine document trawl on a chemical tanker detained in Heraklion, Crete, the situation turned into a full-scale emergency – and an excellent display of teamwork.
Katsinellos, a surveyor for a leading classification society and a fellow at both RINA and IMarEST, had been dispatched to the vessel, which for the purposes of this story we will call the MV Crete, after port state control (PSC) had detained the vessel, requiring the crew to update critical documentation.
Shortly after his arrival onboard MV Crete, a fire in the engine room set off alarms, and changed the whole nature of the visit, according to Katsinellos, with the requirements suddenly very different for both the crew and the maritime surveyor as they moved quickly to deal with the blaze.
“A high-pressure flexible pipe on the air compressor suffered a mechanical failure, resulting in a high-pressure oil leak. The atomised oil ignited upon contact with a hot surface, creating an immediate fire hazard,” says Katsinellos.
![]() |
|---|
Emergency measures
A visit that started out as preparing, reviewing and approving critical documentation and a comprehensive evidence package was now a full-blown emergency. The fire presented an acute risk to the vessel as the air compressor was situated directly adjacent to a fuel tank.
“The primary threat was the rapid conduction of heat to the fuel storage,” says Katsinellos, “which could have led to a secondary, uncontained explosion and a total loss of the machinery space.”
However, the crew, including the senior officers, reacted with speed and discipline. They used portable fire extinguishers to cool the fire-affected area. “Their decisive action contained the fire before boundary cooling became impossible,” says Katsinellos.
The master had immediately contacted PSC and the Hellenic Coast Guard making sure that they were fully briefed and that firefighting tugs remained on standby.
Katsinellos, meanwhile, provided a clear line of communication between the crew and PSC, thereby helping to speed up the crew and shoreside reaction times.
Katsinellos supplied detailed technical information to PSC and the coastguard so that, should they need to intervene, they would have a comprehensive view of the layout of the vessel’s critical engine room.
Following the successful conclusion of the emergency, the surveyor was able to provide a damage survey, verifying that the vessel’s safety systems were operational, and allowing PSC to remain confident in the safety and security of the vessel.
This incident highlights that while high-pressure pipe failures are a known technical risk, the outcome is dictated by the seafarers’ reaction. The combination of a rapid crew response, transparent communication by the master, and the technical seniority of the class surveyor turned a potential disaster into a managed incident, says Katsinellos.
An opportunity to learn
Serendipity played a part in this event with the emergency offering Katsinellos a live lesson on the paper gap; the difference between perfect certification and a physical response.
He says: “Being onboard during a fire provided me with a rare front-row seat to the gap between theoretical safety and real-world chaos. From a surveyor’s perspective, this experience transformed a understanding of shipboard safety from a compliance check into a survival reality.”
Stress testing fire drills
In Katsinellos’ view the industry can learn from such experiences. He adds that it is critical for fire drills to move beyond “muscle memory” and that they should be stress tested.
“A crew’s response is rarely perfect; it is messy,” he notes, and that means that industry training must focus on the human element, “training crews to communicate clearly under the deafening noise of alarms and the disorientation of smoke”.
Moreover, in an emergency, PSC’s role is transformed from regulatory enforcement to risk management, while class plays a key role in establishing the necessary reaction to an emergency, given that it has in-depth technical knowledge of the ship. That requires class and PSC to work together effectively, and for that there must be pre-established trust.
![]() |
|---|
“The industry should encourage more joint walkthroughs to build rapport before a crisis hits. Someone in a technical liaison role is critical to bridge the gap between shoreside tactics and maritime reality,” the surveyor says.
Each incident is a chance for the industry to analyse and learn, and this, comparatively minor, incident offers some rich rewards, particularly where the subject of collaboration is concerned, and the value of experienced, knowledgeable crew.
Invaluable experience
The presence of an experienced surveyor provided PSC with the technical layouts of the ship, including fire zones, fuel tank locations and structural boundaries. This helped PSC and the firefighting tug decide where to focus their work should cooling efforts to prevent structural failure become necessary.
In fact, in this case the crew’s rapid response meant that boundary cooling was unnecessary.
That response was aided by Katsinellos as the ‘catalytic link’. “I translated technical class requirements into actionable status updates for the commander, ensuring the authorities knew exactly which safety systems were compromised in real time.”
The instant collaboration was so effective that commander Stavros Papaderakis wrote to Katsinellos regarding the MV Crete incident: “On behalf of the main PSC inspection office of Heraklion, Crete, I would like to extend our sincere gratitude for your exceptional support and professionalism.”
A pivotal role
Notably, the commander emphasised the importance of the ‘catalytic’ link to the success of the operation.
“Your personal skills and unwavering commitment to monitoring the case played a pivotal role in achieving an accurate and effective resolution,” he said.
“Your presence during the onboard fire incident was truly catalytic. By standing in a hazardous environment and acting as a liaison between the authorities and the ship’s parties, you demonstrated remarkable courage and composure under pressure. Your actions ensured clear communication and coordination at a critical moment.”
This article appeared in Emergency response, TNA May/June 2026.
Why did you choose a career as a naval architect?
A local family friend introduced me to the concept of a naval architect at the same time as I was becoming obsessed with sailing. Dinghy racing with my father, I grew to admire the classic yachts where we sailed at Aldeburgh. When I became the ‘Saturday boy’ at the local boatyard, the owner, Peter Wilson, asked me what I wanted to do when I left school. He was rather surprised when I said I wanted to be a naval architect. From then on he encouraged me to learn as much as I could about boatbuilding and design, lending me books and quizzing me about them.
How did you go about getting an education?
Solent University’s Yacht Design and Production course is the stuff of legends, providing the building blocks for most renowned yacht designers and naval architects of recent decades. It lived up to its reputation, and after three years of pure indulgence in my chosen subject, I was raring to go.
What happened after university?
My first job at G.L. Watson was hugely formative, working with designs I had previously read about and participating in some important yacht restoration projects. I was thrilled to meet and work with some of the greats. It was only the diversity of life outside classic yachts and a desire to learn from a broader church that tempted me away.
After a year in the Netherlands working on the design of very large yachts, I had a thorough education in design office discipline. The subsequent restoration of a 1937 Camper & Nicholson Motor Yacht at Pendennis Shipyard had proved another triumph for the G.L. Watson team but at the end of a three-year project, Cornwall proved hard to leave.
What happened next?
Starting my own office had always been in the back of my head and it was apparent that the south west offered a wealth of diverse opportunities for someone with my accumulated skill set and experience.
I set up my office in 2016 and embarked on seven years of fascinating projects, travel and experiences, and serving the commercial, leisure and research sectors. I was able to take on a junior naval architect and share the knowledge and opportunity that had come my way.
What other roles have you taken on?
Conversations with two separate MCA surveyors led me to a job as an MCA surveyor; a demanding role that comes with no shortage of responsibility, pressures and demands focused on maritime and environmental safety.
Still based in the south west of England, I benefited from some of the best maritime training available, counting a diverse group of hugely competent naval architects, engineers and mariners as my colleagues.
Working with the local fishing fleet was a highlight, becoming familiar with vessel owners and operators who had as close a tie to their vessels as any, each with their own particular challenges and priorities to understand and work with.
The MCA taught me how to be a civil servant and how, no matter the size and complexity of the vessel, from a 400m container ship to a 6m open fishing boat, they are equally deserving of clear and concise professional engagement. The Agency is excellent at matching skill sets to tasks and my knowledge of stability and structures was put to good use.
What now?
I am off to the Caribbean to run a thriving boatyard in English Harbour, Antigua. I hope my skills and experience will contribute to the yard going from strength to strength in supporting the local industry and visiting trade. My existing toolkit of skills will no doubt come in handy but I am looking forward to learning the needs and challenges of my new workplace.
What’s your advice for others?
To anyone thinking of running their own office, go for it! It’s tough, but hugely rewarding. It allows you to go for the work that really interests you and to learn and grow into specialisms that will enthuse you for years.
I have been a RINA member since day one at university when former CEO Trevor Blakeley visited and handed out the forms. Now as a longstanding full member who only recently got their act together to become chartered, I can confidently say that naval architecture has been everything I wanted in a career and more. I am proud to say ‘I am a naval architect’, and, while you never know what the next project will bring, one thing is for certain, you never stop learning.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|---|
This article appeared in Members, TNA May/June 2026.
The Richard B Couch Model Basin at the University of Michigan College of Engineering, following completion of extensive renovations to the 750,000gallon, 360ft-long towing tank facility. The reopening ceremony marked the occasion with a “mixing of the waters”, in which water contributed by 41 hydrodynamics laboratories across 20 countries was poured into the basin, a gesture reflecting the global community the facility has long served.
The basin is the largest towing tank at a US university. Over its 120-year history it has been central to some of the most consequential advances in naval architecture, among them the development of the bulbous bow, the hull form optimisation that reduces wave-making resistance and is now fitted to most large commercial vessels, which combined carry approximately 90% of world trade by volume.
This article appeared in The Big Picture, TNA May/June 2026
When I was 16, a team from Fleet Maintenance & Repair Organisation, later BAE Systems, came to my school to talk to us about apprenticeships, specifically warships. There’s something mesmerising about vast grey ships fitted with missiles and guns, so I took the application pack home.
Little did I know that that single decision would set me on a 30-year career supporting the ships of the Royal Navy.
In 1997, I began my apprenticeship as a plater/fabricator in Portsmouth. It gave me the opportunity to continue my education while learning a skilled trade on the job. Over the next three years, I worked on a wide range of platforms including CVS, Type 22/23 frigates and Type 42 destroyers, and was able to experience other parts of the business, including procurement, planning and design. It was there that something clicked: I realised I wanted to understand why things were designed the way they were, not just how to build them.
There were, of course, parts of the apprenticeship that I did not enjoy, but understanding what doesn’t motivate you is as important as discovering what does. The exposure to a large organisation and its many functions was a huge benefit, and by the time I’d completed my apprenticeship, my career path had started to take shape, and I became a design engineer.
Nevertheless, there was always a part of me that regretted not taking an academic route, but that regret became motivation. Fortunately for me, BAE Systems supports further and higher education and is filled with managers and leaders committed to nurturing and developing talent. This allowed me to build on the foundations laid during my apprenticeship while expanding my knowledge through academic study.
My journey into naval architecture began with a last-minute request to support an inclining experiment in Scotland. That week proved transformative. I found a discipline I was genuinely passionate about, and it opened the door to the career I have today. A year later, I transferred into the naval architecture team and, in parallel, began studying for a master’s degree through the MTEC programme, designed for those in employment and run by the University of Newcastle. I went on to achieve Chartered Engineer status through RINA a few years later.
Today, as a chief engineer at BAE Systems, I look around and see colleagues who have arrived here via many different routes. That variety of experience brings diversity of thought, which ultimately benefits the Royal Navy, and our wider customer base, and creates a rewarding place to work.
STEM Ambassador programme
RINA is calling on members to support its STEM Ambassador programme, connecting experienced engineers with schools and colleges to raise awareness of naval architecture among young people. Despite offering careers at the forefront of technology and sustainability, the discipline remains poorly understood by students, while the maritime industry faces a well-documented shortage of skilled engineers.
The programme is flexible, with a minimum commitment of one activity per year. Ambassadors deliver talks, workshops and mentoring, while also developing their own professional skills. Registration is straightforward via the STEM Learning platform.
This article appeared in Members, TNA May/June 2026.
ClassNK has issued an Approval in Principle (AiP) for a liquefied CO₂ carrier equipped with the Wind Challenger hard sail wind propulsion system, jointly developed by Mitsui O.S.K. Lines and Samsung Heavy Industries. The certificate was presented at a handover ceremony held at Sea Japan 2026.
The AiP confirms the feasibility of the vessel’s conceptual design against applicable rules and safety requirements. ClassNK carried out its review against its Rules and Guidance for the Survey and Construction of Steel Ships and its Guidelines for Wind-Assisted Propulsion Systems for Ships (Edition 2.2).
The vessel presents a notably complex design challenge, combining three distinct technical elements – a forward accommodation arrangement, liquefied CO₂ cargo systems and multiple Wind Challenger units – each of which carries its own risk profile. ClassNK participated in a HAZID risk assessment before issuing the AiP.
This article appeared in Insights, TNA May/June 2026
It is now some 25 years since the conclusion of the Second Formal Inquiry into the loss of MV Derbyshire. The vessel disappeared in September 1980 while on passage from Canada to Japan, carrying over 100,000 tonnes of iron ore. She was lost some hundreds of miles south of Japan in waters 2½ miles deep. At 169,000dwt she remains the largest British merchant vessel ever lost at sea. All 42 crew and two wives aboard perished. The Japanese Maritime Safety Agency reported two oil slicks some 20nm apart in a region where Typhoon Orchid had occurred, but there was no sign of the vessel itself.
Government apathy
What followed was the most disgraceful episode in UK shipping history. Despite the Derbyshire being British-built, British-crewed, UK-classified and UK-owned, there was no significant government response to her loss. Fourteen secretaries of state for transport came and went without ordering any on-site investigation. It was left entirely to the dependants of the 42 crew to pursue the matter, forming the Derbyshire Family Association under the able chairmanship of Paul Lambert. Captain David Ramwell’s efforts in cajoling and convening politicians in Westminster should not be forgotten, either.
The first formal inquiry was inconclusive; the wreck had not been located, though it correctly speculated that the vessel had probably been overcome by the sea. Marine surveyor Peter Ridyard, who had lost a son in the disaster, established prior to the inquiry that the five sister ships had cracking in their deck structures close to the forward faces of the superstructure, at the junction with frame 65.
The hypothesis developed that when these large bulk carriers encountered very large waves in severe sea conditions, the resulting peak stresses sought out local weaknesses in the structure, causing the deck to tear locally at frame 65. The stern would sink at the point of fracture while the nine forward holds floated free until they too foundered. The two oil slicks appeared consistent with this scenario, though this interpretation was later revised.
The critical moment came on 22 July 1993 at a meeting of the International Transport Workers’ Federation attended by NUMAST, the National Union of Seamen and the Derbyshire Family Association. Shaun Kent, a lateral thinker who had studied the seabed conditions at the loss site and who had previously recovered a car-sized section of Derbyshire’s sister ship Kowloon Bridge, including fractures adjacent to the superstructure, proposed a £2m search of the seabed. The proposal was rejected, but a £25,000 investigatory contract was agreed as an alternative.
From this modest sum, David Mearns of Oceaneering was awarded £7,250 to visit Japan and consult the Japanese Maritime Agency. He returned with a finding that proved decisive: one of the two reported oil upwellings had been based on a false helicopter sighting, the aircraft not having had the range to reach the location. This destroyed the two-part fracture hypothesis but, crucially, concentrated the search on a single, much smaller area of seabed. The wreck was found within a week.
Conclusive evidence
A subsequent £2.25m government-funded expedition produced a photographic montage of more than 600 pieces of wreckage across 37,000 images. The evidence showed that the Derbyshire had partially flooded and descended like a submarine, the external pressure at depth causing a massive implosion that accounted for the scale of the destruction. The ensuing investigations led ultimately to a change in IMO rules, mandating stronger hatch cover loading standards for bulk carriers in heavy seas.
Between 1950 and 2000, more than 100 bulk carriers sank and some 1,500 seamen drowned. These losses reflected a catastrophic and prolonged failure of the shipping industry and its regulators. The Derbyshire Family Association, through 20 years of persistence against considerable institutional resistance, changed that. They deserve their place in maritime history for finding the Derbyshire and improving bulk carrier safety. I’m proud to have played my part.
This article appeared in Members, TNA May/June 2026.
Orca AI has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with Samsung Heavy Industries (SHI) to jointly develop and deploy autonomous vessel technologies across both newbuild and retrofit markets.
The phased collaboration will combine SHI’s autonomous solutions with Orca AI’s AI-powered maritime operations system, covering AI-assisted navigation, berthing and speed optimisation.
As part of the agreement, Orca AI will integrate SHI’s SVISION berthing assistance system and autonomous speed control solution into its suite, which currently covers more than 1,200 vessels.
SHI will in turn embed Orca AI’s technology as standard on newbuild vessels equipped with its Samsung Autonomous Ship system. Joint research and development activity will focus on real-time decision support, adaptive navigation and continuous performance optimisation, drawing on large-scale operational data from both companies.
Orca AI’s fully automated SeaPod watchkeeper unit uses computer vision, with both day and thermal cameras, to provide bridge teams with 360° situational awareness, detecting, tracking and prioritising navigational risks in real time.
Yarden Gross, CEO and co-founder of Orca AI, said the partnership created “a practical path to scaling autonomous capabilities, from newbuild vessels to existing fleets”.
SHI executive vice president Hyun Joe Kim, head of SHI’s Autonomous Ship Research Institute, said autonomous navigation is “a key competitive factor for the future of the shipbuilding industry”.
This article appeared in Insights, TNA May/June 2026
The threat landscape facing modern naval forces has changed rapidly. Cheap, mass-produced uncrewed aerial systems, available in vast numbers and increasingly capable of coordinated attack, have exposed the limitations of conventional air defence. Intercepting a drone costing a few hundred pounds with a missile costing tens of thousands is not a sustainable equation. DragonFire is the UK’s answer to that problem.
Developed through an industry partnership led by MBDA with Leonardo UK and QinetiQ, DragonFire is a Laser Directed Energy Weapon system designed as an integral effector within a layered air defence architecture. The system has entered production and is on track to equip the Royal Navy in 2027, with first installations planned aboard Type 45 destroyers. That timeline reflects both the urgency of the threat and the maturity of the technology.
The system is housed in a modular 20ft ISO container, drawing on the host platform’s own power and cooling rather than requiring independent provision. This makes DragonFire straightforward to integrate on to, and remove from, different platforms.
At its core, DragonFire uses coherent beam-combining technology to focus high-energy laser light on to a target with exceptional precision. The system is nominally rated at 50kW and has been designed to be scalable. Its beam director uses three apertures to search, identify and engage. The first acts like a pair of binoculars, scanning a wide area for threats. A second mid-range aperture examines a located target in greater detail. The third, telescope-like aperture provides ultra-precision targeting, narrowing on to the threat and confirming engagement. The beam is produced by compressing raw electrical power into a laser source, then focusing and stabilising it through advanced hardware and algorithms before directing it precisely on to the target, where the intense light cuts through the structure.
A critical design principle is that raw power output is not the primary measure of efficacy in a laser weapon. What matters is how much of the available power can be concentrated on to the most vulnerable point of a target. DragonFire has been specifically engineered to maximise that focused delivery, ensuring rapid intercept rather than simply generating the highest possible beam energy.
Steering the beam with the required accuracy is technically demanding. Fast-moving mirrors direct the laser, with high-speed cameras and sophisticated image-processing algorithms operating at thousands of frames per second providing continuous feedback. Even tiny mirror adjustments translate into large beam movements at range, and as a target heats and begins to give off smoke and particles, its optical signature changes, compounding the tracking challenge.
Atmospheric turbulence is a further obstacle. DragonFire addresses this by increasing power output to compensate for adverse conditions, and applying real-time wavefront correction, measuring the return signal from the target and calculating adjustments to counteract beam distortion before it reaches the aim point.
The trials programme has been methodical. Initial firings against static targets at the Dstl Porton Down range were demonstrated publicly in October 2022. Low-power tracking trials at the MoD Hebrides Range followed in July 2023, with a high-power shot destroying a moving aerial target in October 2023. A further aerial engagement was conducted in January 2024. The consistency of results prompted the UK government to accelerate the programme and commit a further £316 million, bringing total investment to £416 million.
This article appeared in Technical, TNA May/June 2026.
Safety is not theoretical in maritime operations. The high seas remain an unforgiving environment where systems are routinely pushed to their limits. Heavy fuel oil is well understood, with decades of operational experience behind its safety protocols – yet incidents still occur.
Of the alternative fuels, LNG has matured into a proven marine fuel and one that is firmly back in favour after the IMO paused elements of its Net Zero Framework in October 2025. The regulatory hesitancy was quickly reflected in orderbooks, with LNG re-emerging as a favoured and well-understood bridge towards a lower-carbon future.
The other alternative fuels, however, introduce unfamiliar hazards. Hydrogen’s extremely low ignition energy, ammonia’s acute toxicity and methanol’s combination of flammability and toxicity all demand new layers of engineering scrutiny.
For Dr Thomas Beard, clean shipping service lead and principal marine engineer at BMT, the challenge is both technical and urgent. His doctorate in hydrogen safety, completed years before the current fuel debate intensified, has become newly relevant as shipowners seek to find ways to stay profitable, compliant and safe against a backdrop of regulatory uncertainty.
Designing for an uncertain fuel future
With no single alternative poised to displace heavy fuel oil in the near term, and limited fuel availability weighing on shipowner decisions, designers are increasingly adopting flexible, future-proofed layouts.
“In a design perspective, it’ll be like a space grab,” Beard says. “You allocate space for certain equipment and piping that can be retrofitted once the fuels become more available. Then we don’t have the weight penalty of piping we don’t need.”
![]() |
|---|
Space pressures are already acute because all leading alternative fuels have lower volumetric energy density than diesel:
• Methanol: ~15MJ/litre
• LNG (methane): ~13MJ/litre
• Ammonia: ~11.5MJ/litre
• Hydrogen: roughly 3-8MJ/litre depending on storage method.
Lower energy density means larger tanks, which in turn affects vessel layout, cargo capacity and stability calculations.
Storage conditions further complicate matters. Methanol is liquid at ambient conditions and can be stored similarly to diesel. LNG requires cryogenic storage at approximately –162°C, hydrogen at around –253°C or at considerable pressure, and ammonia at roughly –35°C under refrigerated conditions. Each demands dedicated tank systems and safety envelopes.
Reclaiming space through smart design
Some of the lost volume can be clawed back through careful naval architecture. Beard notes that cofferdam (air gap) distances for certain fuels can be reduced from traditional 600mm to around 30mm in specific configurations and with suitable technology.
Methanol offers particular flexibility. Because it is water-soluble, tanks do not always require double-hull separation from the ship’s side shell below the waterline.
“It means we can leverage bits of the design to start maximising the space for the additional storage requirements,” Beard explains.
All of these fuels fall under the IMO’s International Code of Safety for Ship Using Gases or Other Low-flashpoint Fuels (IGF Code). That brings extensive mandatory safeguards and existing knowhow to bear for new problems.
Layers of protection
Modern low-flashpoint fuel systems rely on multiple defensive layers, including:
• Double-walled piping
• Nitrogen inerting systems
• Gas detection and alarm networks
• Airlocks and hazardous zoning
• Dedicated mechanical ventilation
• Redundant power supplies.
Redundancy is particularly critical. Safety and firefighting systems must remain operational even during major failures.
“The fuels are either highly toxic, highly flammable, or a mixture,” Beard says. “You have to design accordingly.”
Ammonia: the toxic threat
Ammonia’s primary hazard is toxicity rather than flammability. It is highly hydrophilic, which means it aggressively attacks moist tissue such as eyes, nose and throat. Exposure risks are severe. Concentrations above 0.25% can be fatal within 30 minutes and, unlike with exposure to some other chemicals, there is no cure.
Under normal operating conditions, the risks are manageable. But maritime operations rarely remain normal.
“At sea, normal conditions can quickly flip into a dark and stormy night scenario,” Beard warns. “That’s where redundancy becomes vital.”
Engineers must ensure sufficient backup power to allow crew in hazmat suits to isolate leaks, purge systems with nitrogen and restore safe conditions.
These realities may limit ammonia’s suitability for passenger vessels.
“It might be feasible on a crew transfer vessel where everyone is trained and buckled into their seats,” Beard says. “On a ferry or cruiseship, passengers are untrained and mobile, and that’s a very big challenge.”
Methanol: the double hazard
Methanol presents both flammability and toxicity risks. It can harm through ingestion, skin absorption or inhalation.
Treatment exists – most commonly fomepizole – but Beard notes an unusual secondary remedy: high-strength ethanol, such as vodka or whisky, which competes metabolically with methanol in the body.
Firefighting presents another complication. Methanol flames can be nearly invisible in daylight, requiring alcohol-resistant foam systems and enhanced detection procedures.
Hydrogen: ultra-flammable but with inbuilt safety features
Hydrogen’s minimum ignition energy is about 0.02MJ – low enough that static electricity from clothing can ignite it. Although this is at ~38% concentration, at 10% concentration the ignition energy is similar to methane (LNG). Yet the fuel also has intrinsic safety advantages.
“What I do like about hydrogen is that it has its own inbuilt safety mechanisms,” Beard says. “It’s the most buoyant and diffusive gas on Earth. It wants to rise and spread out.”
Open-deck storage can, therefore, be advantageous. Below-deck storage, however, introduces major ventilation and explosion-proofing requirements.
Blast-proof ducting, hazardous-zone equipment ratings and dense sensor networks become essential. Detection systems typically trigger at around 50% of the lower flammability limit – well before ignition is possible.
LNG: A familiar contender
Compared with the newer fuels, LNG benefits from a more mature safety framework. Engineers are “quietly confident” in handling it and it now has a proven track record as a marine fuel, even if its well-to-wake emissions are less compelling than some of the potential cleaner alternatives.
The human factor
While engineering controls are advancing rapidly, Beard believes crew competence may be the industry’s greatest challenge.
“These fuels are so different that there’s a strong argument for specialism,” he says.
Yet excessive specialisation could restrict seafarer mobility between vessel types – something crews and operators alike are keen to avoid. The uncertainty over which fuels will dominate further complicates planning. Training investment must be balanced against an unclear long-term fuel mix.
A whole-system challenge
Decarbonisation isn’t just about ships. Beard emphasises that vessel design cannot be separated from shoreside infrastructure.
“It’s no good just designing a ship,” he says. “You also need to work out how to fuel it, wherever it goes. It’s a whole ecosystem. Nobody wants stranded assets.”
It’s clear that decarbonisation will test maritime engineering in ways not seen for generations, and safety will remain the ultimate measure of success.
This article appeared in Features, TNA Mar/Apr 2026
While there are more commercially appealing alternative marine fuels available, hydrogen (H2), a highly flammable and odourless gas that in its super-cooled liquid form will propel man’s return to the moon, is possibly the ‘greenest’ to have made significant maritime inroads over the past 12 months.
Landmark vessel announcements, a regulatory breakthrough at the 11th session of the IMO Sub-Committee on Carriage of Cargoes and Containers in London last September, and the first serious infrastructure commitments have combined to give hydrogen the credibility it lacked just two years ago.
Indeed, there are now more than 20 hydrogen ships in operation, with twice that under construction, representing a number of ship-type ‘firsts’. As far as hydrogen is concerned, 2026 is seeing a real surge in ship design and construction.
The clearest sign that the industry is taking H2 more seriously was in April 2025, when Fincantieri and Viking announced the building of a pair of 54,300gt hydrogen-fuelled cruiseships – the world’s first designed with hydrogen to be stored onboard. Viking Libra, set to join the Viking fleet later this year, features a hybrid 6MW propulsion system based around Isotta Fraschini Motori’s proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cell technology. The decision to store the fuel onboard as cryogenic liquid hydrogen (LH2) in a bespoke container loaded on to the vessel during port calls is a pragmatic workaround to the absence of any fixed LH2 bunkering infrastructure to speak of.
The shortage of H2 bunkering ports is the main impediment to larger deep-sea vessels getting off the drawing board. But things are changing fast.
In May last year, for instance, the Port of Rotterdam and Oslo-based EDGE Navigation signed a Letter of Intent to develop a large-scale hydrogen network across Europe’s largest port complex. The Norwegian maritime technology company is developing a series of commercial LH2-powered cargo ships, as well as an LH2 tanker that can be used for ship-to-ship bunkering. Rotterdam aims to prepare the port for the arrival of these ships from 2028.
![]() |
|---|
Come 2050, it is widely anticipated that global demand for hydrogen will hit 60 million tonnes, fuelling 19% of the world fleet. To this end, Kawasaki Heavy Industries (KHI) and Japan Suiso Energy (JSE) announced at the beginning of this year plans to build a 40,000m3 liquefied hydrogen carrier, the world’s largest, under the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) Green Innovation Fund Project. JSE plans to use the new LHC to demonstrate the ship-to-base loading/unloading under ocean-going conditions by 2023.
The vessel, slated for a building slot at KHI’s Sakaide Works, will join KHI’s 2021-built 1,250m3 capacity Suiso Frontier in taking LH2 cargoes at the Hy touch Kobe LH2 demonstration terminal.
Interestingly, the new vessel’s cargo tanks will use a high-performance insulation system designed to reduce the generation of boil-off gas (BOG) caused by natural heat ingress from the outside, enabling the much larger volume of cryogenic liquid hydrogen to be transported. A heat exchanger will also be installed to allow the BOG to be used for propulsive power. Together with the vessel’s hull form and draught, combined with the low density of liquefied hydrogen, the vessel will have a higher propulsion efficiency for less power, resulting in zero emissions. KHI believes the new vessel will provide the foundation for the future hydrogen supply chain.
Other large commercial ship hydrogen newbuild developments include a pair of 85m bulk carriers for Norwegian shipowner GMI Rederi. Each of these 4,000dwt bulkers will adopt seven PowerCell Marine System 225 units to deliver 3MW of zero-emissions power. When launched in early 2027, the vessels could be the world’s first hydrogen-powered bulk carriers.
Meanwhile, Samskip’s SeaShuttle project represents one of the most ambitious leaps in the maritime industry’s hydrogen surge. Two 135m container ships, currently under construction at Cochin Shipyard in India, are being designed to establish a “green corridor” between Rotterdam and Oslo.
![]() |
![]() |
|---|---|
Each vessel is equipped with a massive 3.2MW hydrogen fuel cell system, a significant scale-up from earlier pilot projects, with liquid hydrogen supplied by Norwegian Hydrogen’s Rjukan plant. These ships have a hatch coverless design, which speeds up port operations, and “autonomous-ready” technology, aiming for remote-controlled efficiency. The first of these vessels is expected to be delivered late in 2026, with full commercial operations beginning in Q2 2027.
While these are some of the larger H2 AMF projects under development, existing smaller-scale projects are providing more immediate operational evidence for the fuel’s wider maritime potential.
One example is the operational data from the 75-passenger hydrogen-fuelled ferry Sea Change, which entered service in San Francisco Bay in July 2024. A study, published in 2025 in the International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, found that its 360kW PEM fuel cells and 246kg of hydrogen (stored at 250 bar) delivered stable and reliable power under real-world duty cycles, achieving an average electrical efficiency of approximately 45-46%.
However, the paper also noted that delivered hydrogen costs averaged approximately US$30/kg during operations, roughly 10 times the cost of diesel, although this increase represents only a 20% hike in total annual operating costs given hydrogen’s higher efficiency. You get more combustion bang for your buck.
![]() |
|---|
![]() |
Norway’s 3,400gt, 82m-long Hydra, the world’s first LH2-powered car and passenger ferry (in service since 2023), is also providing the shipping world with evidence that liquid hydrogen will play an important role in the green maritime transition. Although not as informative as the Sea Change study, 2024 reports from Ballard Power Systems – the fuel cell manufacturer – noted that Hydra has made more than 20,000 crossings, establishing efficient bunkering turnarounds.
However, Hydra has since been eclipsed in scale by Torghatten Nord’s two new 117m hydrogen ferries, Røst and Moskenes, ordered for the Bodø–Lofoten route. These LR-classed double-enders, scheduled for delivery from Myklebust Verft later this year, bring hydrogen fuel cell technology firmly into the size range of conventional long-distance ro-pax tonnage, reducing annual CO₂ emissions on the Vestfjord route by some 26,500tonnes.
Hydrogen for the route will be supplied by GreenH, which is building a bunkering facility at Langstranda, near Bodø, with an eventual output of up to 10tonnes of hydrogen per day. The facility, the first of its kind in Northern Europe, will be the first functioning value chain for hydrogen as a maritime fuel in Norway. And once the first phase is complete later this year, compressed green hydrogen will be delivered directly from the production plant to the vessels via a dedicated pipeline, eliminating the high costs and logistical complexities of road transport. The system utilises a “cascade bunkering” method involving pressure transfer, achieving a minimum transfer speed of 1,700kg/h, allowing full daily refuelling in about three hours.
Australian shipbuilder Incat Crowther and Switch Maritime in the US have announced a project to design and build a hydrogen-fuelled fast ferry for New York City.
The Big Apple’s first ever hydrogen-fuelled ferry, the 28.5m vessel has capacity to ferry 150 passengers at cruising speeds of 25knots. Featuring four H2 tanks capable of storing 720kg of compressed hydrogen, the vessel’s 16 98kW fuel cells will provide power to four Danfoss EM-PMI540-T3000 electric motors, which will in turn drive the catamaran’s twin propellers and other consumers.
Incat Crowther and Switch previously partnered on the design, delivery and regulatory approval for Sea Change – the world’s first zero-emissions hydrogen fuel cell-powered electric passenger ferry. Incat Crowther’s technical manager, Dan Mace, said the design showcases a feasible solution for mass transit operators looking to begin the fleet decarbonisation process, while maintaining existing operational profiles.
“The vessel’s ability to drop in to existing fleets is a real positive step to reduce emissions and ensures the vessel can be deployed quickly without the need for constructing additional shoreside infrastructure,” he said.
The project team plans to launch a ZEF-150 demonstration vessel at the Brooklyn Navy Yard.
These articles appeared in In depth, TNA Mar/Apr 2026
Nominate a colleague, a mentee or a friend for one of our prestiguous Naval Architecture Awards. Chosen by our Committees, the winners will be announced at our Annual Dinner attended by more than 300 maritime professionals, industry leaders and academics. Taking place on 28th May, this will be an evening of celebration at the historic De Vere Grand Connaught Rooms in London.
Nominations deadline: on 31st December. Award categories include Innovation, Safety and Diversity.