You can't just add autonomy
James Gladman on staying in control and why HAT is key.
Join RINA
Take 10 seconds to nominate a colleague, mentee or friend for our Forbes-style list. Must be under the age of 40 in 2026. Open to all maritime professions associated with naval architecture. See eligibility criteria. [hyperlinked].
"Ours is the generation facing challenges like decarbonization and autonomy. We don't have the solutions yet, but one thing is clear - collaboration will be key. At RINA, our mission is to advance top talent and create liquid networks between all maritime professions [hyperlink to 16 professions graphics] so interdisciplinary innovation can flourish."
Catriona Savage FREng, RINA President and BMT Programme Director
Join RINA
Renowned for the technical excellence of our events, publications and learning, we offer career pathways for naval architects and 16 associated professions [hyperlink to 16 professions].
We cover everything from super yachts and green propulsion to warship resilience. Network 1-2-1 with top talent at our events or influence the maritime industry by joining one of our comittees.
We promote the interdisciplinary conversation at the heart of maritime innovation. Speak at our events, publish in our journals or simply join the discussion forums on our website.
?? HOW?? FILL IN EMAIL HERE AND SIGN UP WITH 1 CLICK
RINA’s Warship 2026: Submarines conference, on 24-25 June 2026, University of Bath. How a wargame series is being used to help combat hostile underwater activity.
A summary of Ulf Hansen’s presentation at the 2026 RINA Ship Energy Efficiency Conference.
Wärtsilä, the Helsinki-based technology group, has released NTPRO 7, the latest iteration of its navigational training simulation platform.
Chloe Yarrien and Jake Rigby take us behind the scenes of BMT’s MODUS family of modular uncrewed surface vessels.
Autonomy and technology are reshaping offshore surveys in hard-to-reach places, says Anne-Marie Causer.
We hear from an engineering consultancy about its mentorship needs – and what it can offer in return.
DeepOcean innovation set to reduce costs and time spent on subsea inspection programmes.
The distinguished naval architect on skills, talent and a life in design.
Shipbuilder branches out with collaboration on Spectre; Chartwell and Japanese shipbuilders sign wind deal; and historic tug to become a yacht. TNA Insights.
From flagship international conferences to specialist technical seminars, RINA events bring together experts, innovators, and professionals to share knowledge and shape the future of naval architecture.
Explore Upcoming Events
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
CLICK HERE
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.
CLICK HERE














Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Shipbuilding has always absorbed the technologies of its era, from iron hulls to diesel propulsion to computer-aided design. The current transition is no different in kind, but it is different in scale. Digitalisation and artificial intelligence (AI) are not simply new tools added to an existing process, they are reshaping the logic of how vessels are conceived, built and operated. For shipyards that move quickly, the competitive implications are substantial.
Machine learning algorithms can evaluate thousands of hull configurations, propulsion options and internal layouts in the time it would take a design team to assess a handful. Predictive analytics can flag structural risks and schedule delays before they materialise on the shop floor. The effect is not just faster work, but qualitatively better decisions, made earlier, when they are still cheap to act on.
The design imperative
Design typically accounts for 5 to 10% of a vessel’s total production cost, yet that investment determines roughly 85% of final construction expenditure and conditions nearly 90% of operational performance across the vessel’s lifetime. The early decisions made regarding hull form, structural approach, propulsion and energy systems cascade through every subsequent phase. Getting them right is not merely a design office concern, it is the single greatest lever available to improve project economics.
Fragmented or linear workflows are no longer adequate to manage this responsibility. The interdependence between hull, structure, mechanical systems, piping and electrical architecture means that changes in one domain propagate unpredictably through others. AI-assisted integrated design environments address this directly: optimising weight distribution, identifying interference risks between components, and running multiphysics simulations that analyse several interacting physical phenomena simultaneously. Engineers can explore a far larger solution space in the concept phase, which is where that exploration has the highest return.
The traditional spiral design model, iterating sequentially through concept, preliminary and detailed phases, struggles to accommodate this level of interdisciplinary integration. A model-based approach, closer to the V-model used in other advanced engineering disciplines, better reflects how modern design actually works: in parallel, with continuous validation against requirements rather than staged handoffs.
![]() |
|---|
Digital twins across the lifecycle
The digital twin has become a central concept in next-generation shipbuilding, although its value depends entirely on how it is implemented. A static geometric model is not a digital twin in any meaningful sense. The useful version is a live, data-enriched representation of the vessel that is updated throughout its lifecycle, first with design and simulation data, then with construction data, and finally with operational data from IoT sensors monitoring systems at sea.
This continuous feedback loop changes the economics of both construction and operation. Validating vessel behaviour under a wide range of conditions before the first steel plate is cut reduces costly late-stage design changes. Once in service, condition-based monitoring and predictive maintenance strategies, driven by real-time sensor data, can extend equipment lifespan and reduce unplanned downtime. Crucially, the operational data also feeds back into future design processes, improving the accuracy of the models used on the next vessel.
Underpinning all of this is what practitioners call the digital thread: a single, authoritative data environment that consolidates mechanical, electrical, piping and structural design into one system. Global teams work from the same model regardless of location or time zone, eliminating the version-control failures and conflicting drawings that have historically generated rework. The digital thread does not just accelerate the process; it changes its error profile, removing entire categories of mistake.
AI in the shipyard
The application of AI extends well beyond the design office. On the production floor, AI-driven planning systems optimise construction sequences, predict schedule risk and identify inefficiencies before they compound. Computer vision algorithms inspect welds and component alignment in real time, catching defects that human inspectors may miss under production-line conditions and that, if left undetected, become exponentially more expensive to rectify.
The integration of machine learning into computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations is particularly significant. CFD has long been a bottleneck in hull optimisation, computationally expensive and therefore limited in how many alternatives a design team can practically evaluate. Machine-learning-accelerated CFD dramatically shortens computation times, allowing iterative hull form optimisation across resistance, energy efficiency and fuel consumption without proportionally increasing engineering cost.
Augmented and virtual reality tools are changing workforce training and assembly guidance. Rather than relying on paper drawings or static digital files, technicians can work with spatially accurate overlays that guide complex assembly tasks, reducing errors and accelerating the learning curve for less experienced workers. As yards compete for skilled labour in a tight market, these tools have operational as well as quality implications.
Challenges that remain
None of this is straightforward to implement. Technological interoperability, getting legacy systems, supplier data and new platforms to communicate cleanly, remains a significant operational headache. Initial investment costs are substantial and the return on investment, while real, is distributed over years rather than visible in a single project. Cybersecurity risks increase as shipyard infrastructure becomes more connected. And workforce transformation requires sustained investment in training that many yards have historically under-resourced.
Regulatory compliance adds another layer of complexity. IMO emission reduction targets – 70 to 80% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by 2040 and net zero by 2050 – create design requirements that did not exist a decade ago. Meeting those targets while managing cost and schedule pressure demands exactly the kind of multi-variable optimisation that AI tools are best suited to support. But it also requires regulatory frameworks to keep pace with the technologies being adopted, which is not always the case.
Product Lifecycle Management solutions have proven their value in managing the data complexity associated with these challenges. Yards that have centralised their data environments report improved resilience against supply chain disruptions, better customisation capability for client requirements, and more reliable planning processes. The pandemic-era supply chain failures accelerated adoption in a number of cases, demonstrating that digital integration is not just a competitive advantage but an operational necessity.
The direction of travel
The convergence of naval engineering and AI is not a future prospect – it is already visible in yards across Europe, Asia and the Americas. Digital twins are reducing construction time and cost. AI is cutting material waste and catching operational issues before delivery. Simulation tools are informing maintenance planning in military and commercial contexts alike. The technology is available; the differentiating variable is the organisational will and capability to deploy it effectively.
The next step in this evolution is the genuinely paperless vessel – not just a ship designed without drawings, but one operated and maintained through precise digital records, live system data and AI-supported decision-making throughout its service life. That is a more significant transformation than the industry has seen in generations, and the yards that position themselves for it now will have an advantage that compounds over time.
For naval architects, this shift redefines the scope of the discipline. The skills required to design a hull remain essential; the skills required to model its behaviour in a connected digital environment, and to interpret what that model tells you, are becoming equally so. The best engineering judgement has always been informed by the best available data. The change is that the data is now better, faster and more comprehensive than anything the industry has previously worked with.
This article appeared in Features, TNA Mar/Apr 2026
American shipbuilder Davie Defense has been awarded a contract by the United States Coast Guard to construct five Arctic Security Cutters (ASC), a new class of polar icebreaker intended to strengthen US presence in the High North. The award, announced in early 2026, forms part of a wider programme of up to 11 vessels authorised by Presidential Memorandum and represents one of the most significant US polar shipbuilding contracts in a generation.
The ASC is a substantial vessel: 99.9m in length, 21m in beam, displacing 9,000tonnes at normal operating draught of 7m. Ice Class PC3 rated, she is designed to maintain 3knots through 1.5m of ice. A diesel-electric propulsion system delivers 22MW of total installed power through two azimuth thrusters of 6.5MW each, supplemented by two 1.3MW bow thrusters, generating a bollard pull of 150tonnes.
Two independent engine rooms provide redundancy critical for operations in remote polar waters. Top speed is 16knots, with a range exceeding 6,500nm at 12knots in normal operating mode, extending beyond 12,000nm in high endurance configuration at deeper draught.
Endurance is up to 60 days, with accommodation for up to 124 crew and passengers. Mission payload capacity stands at 650m2 of covered and uncovered main deck space, capable of carrying up to 17 TEU, ground vehicles, unmanned systems and boats. The vessel also carries a helicopter platform and hangar sized for the MH-60 and UAVs.
The design draws on a proven platform with seven previous variants delivered from Helsinki Shipyard, accumulating a combined 85 years of winter operation in Arctic regions. One vessel from the existing fleet has transited the Northeast Passage unescorted in 8.5 days, a data point that speaks directly to the platform’s operational credibility in the conditions the Coast Guard requires.
The programme’s construction strategy is split across two countries. To meet the accelerated delivery schedule, the first two hulls will be built at Helsinki Shipyard in Finland, a sister facility within the UK-owned Inocea maritime group, targeting delivery of the inaugural vessel in 2028. The remaining three cutters will follow at Davie’s facilities in Galveston and Port Arthur, Texas, yards acquired from Gulf Copper & Manufacturing in 2025 and bringing over 75 years of Gulf Coast fabrication experience.
The rationale for opening the programme in Finland is that no active American yard has the icebreaker construction expertise needed to hit the schedule. The technology transfer dimension is therefore the most industrially significant aspect of the contract.
US shipbuilders will work alongside Helsinki’s specialists during the Finnish builds to develop the domestic competency needed for series production in Texas. It is an ambitious timeline, and whether Galveston and Port Arthur can absorb that knowledge base within the compressed window of the first two hulls will be the programme’s defining industrial challenge.
The strategic impetus is clear. Russia operates the world’s largest icebreaker fleet, including nuclear-powered vessels capable of year-round polar transit, while China has been steadily expanding its polar capabilities.
The United States has operated with a critically thin polar fleet for decades, and the Presidential Memorandum authorising the ASC programme reflects a belated but determined effort to address that deficit.
Davie Defense sits within Inocea, a privately held British marine industrial group with operations across the US, Canada and Finland. The Coast Guard’s decision to award to a group with operationally proven icebreaker heritage, rather than a domestic yard learning the discipline from scratch, reflects the urgency of the delivery timeline.
With Arctic competition intensifying and the Polar Security Cutter programme still unresolved, Washington needed a credible near-term answer. The ASC’s specifications and its platform’s track record suggest the design is capable of providing one. Whether the industrial strategy can match the vessel’s ambition will become clear as the first hull takes shape in Helsinki.
Kai Skvarla, CEO of Davie Defense, said: “We’re deeply honoured by this vote of confidence. We can’t wait to get started on delivering mission-ready cutters to our valued US Coast Guard partner. By anchoring construction in Texas, while drawing on Helsinki Shipyard’s proven icebreaker expertise, we can deliver the ASCs to meet the Coast Guard’s operational needs in the world’s harshest environments.”
This article appeared in In depth, TNA Mar/Apr 2026
| ARCTIC SECURITY CUTTER STATISTICS | |
|---|---|
| Length | 99.9m |
| Breadth | 21m |
| Draught | 6.5m-7.9m |
| Normal operation mode | 7m draught |
| High endurance/max cargo mode | 7.6m draught |
| Displacement | 9,000tonnes |
| Ice Class PC3 | 1.5m ice@3knots. Breaks ice 5ft thick @3knots ahead and astern |
| Speed | 16knots |
| Range | 6,500+nm @12knots, normal operational mode; 12,000+nm @12knots, high endurance mode |
| Endurance | up to 60days |
| Crew/PAX | max 124 |
| Machinery | Diesel-electric total installed power 22MW, two independant engine rooms |
| Propulsion | Azimuth thrusters (2x 6.5MW), bow thrusters (2x 1.3MW), bollard pull 150tonnes |
| Seakeeping | Roll reduction tanks for roll damping |
| Helicopter | Platform and hanger for MH-60 and UAVs |
| Mission payload capacity | 650m2 covered/uncovered main deck space; e.g. 17TEU, ground vehicles, UXVs, boats |
| Large deck cranes | Loading and unloading; launch and recovery |
| Enclosed reconfigurable mission space | e.g. for medical treatment, disaster relief, vehicle transport, special mission equipment |
There is a temptation, amid the complexity of global shipping regulation and the slow grind of intergovernmental negotiation, to conclude that the maritime sector’s decarbonisation agenda has stalled. That temptation should be firmly resisted. The wind has not gone out of the sails of maritime decarbonisation, and those who work in wind propulsion are among the clearest proof of it.
That was the central message I brought to the Wind Propulsion Conference, hosted jointly by the International Windship Association and the Royal Institution of Naval Architects in February. Speaking to an audience of naval architects, operators and technology developers, people who have committed careers and capital to the practical deployment of wind-assisted propulsion, I wanted to make one point above all others: progress continues, and we must maintain our course.
The IMO’s World Maritime Day theme for 2026 and 2027, ‘From Policy to Practice: Powering Maritime Excellence’, captures precisely the challenge and the opportunity. It is not enough to have agreed ambitious targets. The real work lies in turning collective regulatory decisions into real-world results that deliver tangible benefits for the sector and for the planet. No single organisation can do that alone. It requires administrations, classification societies, naval architects, shipowners, operators and individual mariners all pulling in the same direction.
Wind propulsion sits squarely within that ‘policy to practice’ agenda. It is a mature, cost-effective solution to reducing greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping and, crucially, it is available today. Not in 10 years’ time. Not in five years. Now.
The regulatory framework that underpins this is already well established. For more than a decade, IMO has developed and strengthened a suite of energy efficiency standards – the Energy Efficiency Design Index, the Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index, the Carbon Intensity Indicator, and the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan – that have delivered concrete results.
Taken together, these measures have reduced the carbon intensity of international shipping by more than 38%, compared with 2008 levels. Ships today emit roughly 38% less CO₂ for the same transport work than they did at the start of this century. That is a significant achievement, and one that is too often overlooked in debate dominated by what remains to be done.
Market data reinforces the direction of travel. According to recent figures from Clarksons Research, nearly half the global fleet, 47% of world tonnage, is now fitted with at least one energy-saving technology. The trend towards further uptake is clear and accelerating. Wind propulsion technologies are part of that picture, and the industry’s investment in them continues to grow.
I must be clear on one point: IMO is technology neutral. The Secretariat does not promote or discourage any particular solution. There is no silver bullet and no one-size-fits-all pathway. Multiple routes to decarbonisation will coexist, and that is as it should be. What the regulatory framework must do, and what it is actively being designed to do, is ensure that all fuels and technologies are treated fairly and consistently, based on their well-to-wake emissions.
This is where wind propulsion faces both an opportunity and a challenge. In January 2026, the IMO’s Sub-Committee on Ship Design and Construction developed a draft safety workplan for greenhouse gas-reducing technologies, explicitly including wind propulsion. That workplan will go to the Maritime Safety Committee for approval in May 2026. It marks an important step: the formal integration of wind technologies into IMO’s safety framework, providing the regulatory clarity that owners and operators need to invest with confidence.
![]() |
|---|
On the regulatory horizon, the picture is more complex. Discussions on the next set of measures under the IMO Net-Zero Framework were adjourned last October. This was not a retreat from ambition. The commitment among Member States and industry to global regulation remains strong. But it created additional time, and that time is being used. MEPC 84, scheduled for April 2026, will continue discussions on the way forward, including the greenhouse gas fuel intensity (GFI) reduction requirements that will form the core of the next regulatory package.
Within that work, the development of GFI Calculation Guidelines is giving due consideration to the inclusion and fair treatment of wind propulsion, a recognition that its contribution to fuel saving must be properly accounted for if owners are to have the certainty they need. Contributions from the International Windship Association have been genuinely valuable here, helping to shape how the GFI will function in practice. That kind of direct industry engagement with the regulatory process is exactly what is needed.
Yet there is a shadow over the progress. Despite the improvement in carbon intensity, total fuel consumption by ships has remained broadly stable in recent years. Absolute greenhouse gas emissions have not yet declined significantly. Efficiency gains are being absorbed by growth in trade and fleet size. This is why the next regulatory package matters so much, and why inaction is not an option.
For naval architects and marine engineers, the message is one of both validation and urgency. The technologies you design, specify and integrate are not peripheral to the decarbonisation agenda, they are central to it. Wind propulsion, in particular, offers something rare in the energy transition: a proven, scalable, fuel-free reduction in emissions that can be retrofitted to existing vessels and designed into new ones. The regulatory framework is catching up. The market is moving. The only question is pace.
There may be diplomatic storms to navigate and regulatory mechanisms to refine, but the direction is set. We must maintain our course. The wind is with us.
This article appeared in Features, TNA Mar/Apr 2026
Hanwha Ocean is embedding its shipbuilding expertise directly into Canadian industry. The South Korean shipbuilder has signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Ontario Shipyards and a trilateral Letter of Intent (LoI) with Ontario Shipyards and Mohawk College, establishing a technology transfer, industrial modernisation and workforce development framework in the Great Lakes region. The move is part of an effort to position itself for the Canadian Patrol Submarine Project (CPSP), one of the most consequential naval procurement decisions in Canadian history.
The CPSP aims to replace the Royal Canadian Navy’s ageing Victoria-class submarines with up to 12 modern vessels. Hanwha’s proposed platform is the KSS-III, a conventionally powered submarine designed for long-range operations and sustained presence at sea, including in Arctic environments, with a mature, production-ready design and lithium-ion propulsion.
The lithium-ion battery system offers significantly higher energy density than traditional lead-acid batteries. Combined with a fuel cell-based Air Independent Propulsion system, this advanced configuration enables the submarine to remain submerged for extended periods and sustain maximum underwater speed up to three times longer than submarines using lead-acid batteries. This system has enabled the KSS-III to set a world record for the longest continuous underwater operation by a conventional submarine. In addition, lithium-ion batteries provide longer life cycles and simplified maintenance, lowering both operational and sustainment costs.
Hanwha Ocean claims the programme would generate 200,000 job-years over 15 years and support approximately 15,000 jobs per year on average across a pan-Canadian industrial alliance of more than 100 companies.
![]() |
![]() |
|---|
The bilateral MoU commits Hanwha Ocean to structured technical and operational support across design and engineering, production planning, construction sequencing, quality management and smart-yard best practices. A near-term proof-of-concept is built into the agreement: Hanwha Ocean will support the design and construction of a training and recruitment vessel that Ontario Shipyards will begin building in 2026, providing a live demonstration of the partnership’s industrial intent rather than relying on declarations alone.
Workforce development will be addressed through the trilateral LOI, which establishes an embedded training hub at Ontario Shipyards’ Hamilton facility in partnership with Mohawk College. The college will lead programming across welding, electrical trades, marine mechanics, robotics and non-destructive evaluation. It is a curriculum mapped directly onto the skilled trades shortfall that has constrained Canadian shipbuilding for years.
Apprenticeship pathways will be integrated with production schedules, with applied research in automation and digital manufacturing on the agenda too. Hanwha Ocean will contribute technical advisory support and access to its global industrial networks to align training with international standards.
Both documents contain conditional language tying further Hanwha investment, including a dedicated training centre and expanded supply chain engagement, to the award of the CPSP contract.
![]() |
|---|
Hanwha has been active across Canada, with Quebec’s minister of international relations, Christopher Skeete, visiting the Geoje shipyard in February, and Canadian yard leaders separately touring the facility to discuss collaboration and MRO opportunities. Hanwha’s Geoje shipyard covers 5km2, employs more than 31,000 people and has delivered more than 1,400 vessels since 1973, including submarines and surface combatants for the Republic of Korea Navy.
Ontario Shipyards, the largest ship repair and construction company on the Great Lakes, now has facilities at Hamilton, Port Weller and Thunder Bay.
The combination of Hanwha’s production systems and Ontario’s existing infrastructure represents a credible industrial base, although execution of the knowledge transfer at the pace and depth the CPSP would require remains the programme’s defining test.
This article appeared in In depth, TNA Mar/Apr 2026
Lloyd’s Register (LR) has verified the sea trials performance assessment methodology used by GT Wings for its AirWing Jet Sail system. This provides an independent stamp of approval for the way the company measures fuel and emissions savings from its wind-assisted propulsion technology.
Announced at RINA’s Wind Propulsion Conference, the verification follows nearly 10 months of commercial operation of a 20m AirWing unit onboard Vectis Progress, a general cargo vessel operated by Carisbrooke Shipping. Installed in March 2025, the system has accumulated service experience across various routes and conditions, including North Atlantic winter passages, Great Lakes transits and Caribbean voyages.
Lloyd’s Register confirmed that GT Wings’ methodology aligns with recognised industry standards, including ISO 19030, and ITTC performance analysis practices, and that the approach used to isolate and quantify wind propulsion benefits is technically sound for in-service evaluation.
Andrew Hurford, senior specialist at Lloyd’s Register, said that independent verification of such methodologies is essential to building confidence in emerging maritime technologies.
As wind-assisted propulsion moves towards broader commercial adoption, the ability to demonstrate performance through independently verified, standardised methods is increasingly important for shipowners, charterers and project financiers weighing the business case for such systems. GT Wings said that data collection and analysis from Vectis Progress will continue as part of its ongoing validation programme.
Liam Campbell, chief commercial officer at GT Wings, said: “From the start, our vision has been to drive the transition through measurable, data‐driven performance. Lloyd’s Register’s verification confirms our alignment with international standards and validates that our performance predictions are grounded in real‐world evidence. It is an important step toward scaling wind‐assisted propulsion across global shipping and strengthening confidence in this technology as a viable pathway to reducing carbon emissions.”
This article appeared in News, TNA Mar/Apr 2026
The Grimaldi Group has taken delivery of Grande Michigan, the eighth ammonia-ready pure car and truck carrier (PCTC) in its fleet, from China Merchants Heavy Industries Jiangsu. Built to 220m in length with a beam of 38m, a gross tonnage of 93,145 and a service speed of 18knots, the vessel continues a fleet renewal programme that has established Grimaldi as one of the more technically progressive operators in the automotive shipping sector.
Across its 14 decks, Grande Michigan has a maximum capacity of 9,000 car equivalent units, with stowage arrangements capable of accommodating battery electric vehicles alongside those running on conventional fuels, a flexibility that has become a commercial requirement as the automotive sector’s transition to electrification continues at uneven pace across different markets.
The vessel is fitted with a gate rudder, a configuration first introduced to the PCTC sector on Grande Shanghai, the lead vessel of this series, delivered in July 2025, and now standard across the class. Developed originally by Kuribayashi Steamship in Japan and licensed globally by Wärtsilä, the arrangement positions two foil-shaped blades symmetrically either side of the propeller centreline. It functions simultaneously as a post-swirl energy recovery device, capturing rotational energy from the propeller slipstream that would otherwise be lost, and as a conventional steering system, with the claimed benefit of improved low-speed manoeuvrability at the automotive terminals at which the vessel will regularly call.
Grimaldi claims a 50% reduction in fuel consumption compared with earlier-generation car carriers, attributing the figure to a package of efficiency measures. These include an air lubrication system reducing frictional resistance at the hull-water interface, a silicone-based foul-release hull coating, and 2,500m2 of solar panels across the upper decks. Smart building management systems govern ventilation and air conditioning loads to reduce hotel power demand. The 50% figure is presented without a defined baseline vessel or operational condition and should be read as a comparative design estimate rather than a demonstrated in-service figure.
The main engine is electronically controlled and fitted with an exhaust gas cleaning system to limit sulphur oxide and particulate matter output. Selective catalytic reduction maintains nitrogen oxide emissions below IMO Tier III limits.
A lithium-ion battery energy storage system with a combined capacity of 5MWh supports onboard power management. The vessel is also fitted for cold ironing, enabling zero-emission port operations wherever shore power infrastructure is available, a capability of growing relevance as EU regulations extend onshore power supply obligations at European terminals.
Grande Michigan has received the Ammonia Ready notation from Italian classification society RINA, confirming that her structural arrangements, piping routing, ventilation provisions, and safety systems have been designed to facilitate future conversion to ammonia-fuelled propulsion without major structural intervention. The notation reflects the industry’s broader effort to preserve conversion optionality on newbuilds, given the current immaturity of ammonia bunkering infrastructure and the unresolved challenges surrounding the fuel’s toxicity in a shipboard environment.
Additional RINA notations include Green Plus, Green Star 3, Comfort Vibration, and Comfort Noise Port. The Comfort notations address habitability standards, a consideration of some weight on a vessel that will operate on a continuous deep-sea rotation.
Grande Michigan departed on her maiden voyage from Taicang, China, the commercial loading port proximate to the CMHI Jiangsu yard, carrying more than 7,000 cars and vans alongside more than 100 rolling units including heavy vehicles, MAFI trailers, and project cargo, bound for Mediterranean ports on Grimaldi’s Asia–Europe service.
The delivery extends a newbuild programme that has seen Grimaldi take eight ammonia-ready PCTCs in relatively quick succession. Whether the efficiency package’s cumulative gains can be validated under operational conditions across varied load factors and seasonal routing will be of material interest to competitors and the wider automotive logistics market.
This article appeared in News, TNA Mar/Apr 2026
Wärtsilä Gas Solutions has been awarded a contract to supply cargo handling and fuel gas supply systems for two new LNG bunkering vessels currently under construction at Zhejiang Xinle Shipbuilding in China.
The vessels, each with a capacity of 20,000m³, will be owned by a Hong Kong-based shipowner. The order was booked in Q4 2025 and reinforces Wärtsilä Gas Solutions’ position as a leading systems integrator for small-scale LNG applications.
The contract covers a comprehensive systems package including LNG cargo handling and fuel gas supply equipment, full system engineering and design, and integrated control and monitoring of all cargo handling operations. This level of systems integration is critical in bunkering vessel design, where operational reliability and safety margins are paramount.
“The use of LNG is key in enabling a green shipping future,” said Barry Yang, general manager of sales China at Wärtsilä Gas Solutions, adding that the systems offer a flexible and proven solution supporting operational efficiency for vessels bunkering LNG-fuelled ships.
The vessels will fill an increasingly important role in the marine energy transition. LNG continues to be adopted as a bridging fuel between conventional diesel and future zero-carbon alternatives, driving demand for purpose-built bunkering infrastructure.
Equipment delivery to the Zhejiang Xinle yard is scheduled to commence in Q4 2026, with both vessels expected to enter service during the latter half of 2027.
The number of LNG-fuelled ships in operation doubled between 2021 and 2024, with a record number of deliveries (169) in 2024, according to DNV, a Norway-based independent assurance and risk management provider. By the end of last year, 641 LNG-powered ships were in operation. According to the orderbook, this number is expected to double by the end of the decade.
While the bunkering infrastructure for some alternative fuels remains underdeveloped, DNV said LNG bunkering is maturing, adding that the significant gap between LNG bunkering supply and demand is expected to widen over the next five years based on the orderbook.
This article appeared in News, TNA Mar/Apr 2026
The UK’s Marine Accident Investigation Branch (MAIB) has appointed Rob Loder as its new chief inspector of marine accidents, succeeding Andrew Moll OBE, who retired earlier this month after 21 years at the organisation.
Loder’s career began at sea: after training in heavy engineering ashore, he joined the Merchant Navy, completed a rating to officer conversion course, and rose to chief engineer across a varied fleet, including oil tankers, cable ships, ferries and superyachts. He subsequently moved into fleet management, ship repair, ship build supervision and project management before a period of industry consultancy.
His experience spans design-adjacent disciplines such as ship-build supervision and project management alongside deep operational knowledge. Loder joined MAIB in 2020 as an inspector, progressing to principal inspector and then deputy chief inspector before his current appointment. He is a chartered engineer, marine engineer and Fellow of IMarEST.
![]() |
|---|
Headquartered in Southampton, MAIB was established in 1989 following a recommendation from the public inquiry into the Herald of Free Enterprise disaster in 1987, when a ro-ro passenger ferry capsized off Zeebrugge with the loss of 193 lives. It is authorised to investigate all maritime accidents in UK waters and accidents involving UK-registered ships worldwide.
In 2024, MAIB recorded 1,631 reports of accidents involving UK vessels worldwide or vessels within UK coastal waters, with 1,753 vessels involved.
Loder said: “Working alongside the outstanding MAIB team, I am committed to ensuring our work continues to drive meaningful improvements in safety across the maritime sector.”
This article appeared in News, TNA Mar/Apr 2026
Ocean transportation company Sallaum Lines has shifted toward ordering LNG newbuilds, following initial reliance on second-hand vessels for its PCTC fleet, as part of an ambitious goal to achieve net-zero operational emissions by 2050.
“The decision to order newbuilds was driven by technical and environmental performance objectives, not by cost alone,” Charbel Khoueiry, maritime sustainability manager, says. “Sallaum Lines required vessels that could fully comply with IMO Tier III, the IGF Code, EEDI Phase 3 and forthcoming CII targets, while integrating dual-fuel LNG propulsion, electric vehicle-ready cargo decks and advanced hydrodynamic features.
“These parameters would have been impossible to achieve through retrofit without extensive structural and machinery compromises. Newbuilds designed from the keel up provide optimised hull efficiency, lower emissions and long-term lifecycle compliance with current and anticipated regulations.”
Consequently, Sallaum Lines is adding six large, dual-fuel LNG PCTC newbuilds to its fleet. The first duo in the series – the 199.9m, Ocean Breeze and Ocean Explorer – were designed by Shanghai Merchant Ship Design & Research Institute (SDARI) and constructed by Fujian Mawei Shipyard, with Ocean Breeze delivered in Q3 2025 and Ocean Explorer scheduled for delivery in Q1 2026. A further four PCTCs, designed by Deltamarin are currently under construction at China Merchants Heavy Industries (CMHI) and scheduled for delivery throughout 2026-2027.
Ocean Breeze runs on LNG, MGO and VLSFO, and can operate in LNG-only, fuel oil-only or dual-fuel modes, depending on prevailing voyage or port conditions. Khoueiry explains: “We selected LNG because it offers a proven, commercially available and technically mature, low-emission pathway that complies with current environmental regulations. It eliminates SOx and PM, reduces NOx by up to 80% through exhaust gas recirculation [EGR] and lowers CO2 by approximately 20–25%.”
At a continuous sailing speed of 17knots, the vessel is estimated to achieve a range of approximately 12,600nm when operating on LNG, 3,000nm on MGO and 7,800nm on VLSFO. Taken together, the vessel’s total potential sailing range with full tank capacity is approximately 23,400nm.
The powertrain aboard Ocean Breeze incorporates a MAN B&W main engine, rated 12,614kW at 99rpm, and three auxiliary Wärtsilä 9L20DF engines, rated 1,613kW apiece, in addition to a 200kW emergency generator. “All machinery is installed in an aft engine room with segregated LNG and ventilation spaces, in accordance with the IGF Code and ABS requirements,” says Khoueiry.
The ship is also fitted with two Type C LNG storage tanks, each featuring the capacity for about 1,768m3 of LNG.
LNG is vaporised and supplied to the engines via a dual-pressure fuel gas supply arrangement, providing high-pressure gas at approximately 315bar to the main engine and low-pressure gas to the dual-fuel generator engines.
The PCTC is equipped with a single fixed-pitch propeller and a semi-balanced twisted rudder with bulb, developed by SDARI to enhance propulsive efficiency. The vessel is designed for a service speed of 18.5knots at design draught, allowing for a 15% sea margin.
The ship was classed by ABS, achieving full IGF, ENVIRO and operational notations. “Safety features include gas-tight LNG spaces, independent ventilation, double-walled gas piping, ESD systems, CO₂ fire protection and EV fire zones with continuous detection for the hydrogen/CNG vehicle areas,” says Khoueiry. This was accompanied by crew training in LNG handling, carried out in line with IMO/IGF Code competence standards.
As another green bonus, the ship has been treated with Chugoku Marine Paints’ SEAFLO NEO SLZ low-friction antifouling coating, developed to keep the hull continuously smooth, reducing hydrodynamic drag and fuel consumption and enabling higher vessel speeds.
After decades of building purpose-designed and built ships that sometimes failed to meet requirements and often experienced significant cost overruns, the US Navy is pioneering a new approach to shipbuilding with its Landing Ship Medium (LSM) programme, an approach it hopes will enable it to quickly bring large numbers of newbuilds into service on time and on budget.
US Navy secretary John Phelan said the new approach adopted for the LSM procurement would be based on a “non-developmental design” that will not require significant adaptation.
The design selected by the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), Damen Shipyards Group’s LST100, has already been adopted by the Royal Australian Navy, for whom eight examples will be built in Australian yards, and will, said the Naval Sea Systems Command, “enable rapid fielding of this urgently needed capability… and shorten acquisition timelines”.
The LST100 was selected after a ‘side-by-side’ analysis of existing designs that had the potential to meet the LSM requirement. NAVSEA’s analysis of the designs was informed by technical data packages, augmented by hands-on ship visits. Up to 35 LSMs will now be built at US yards that will compete with one another for contracts to build the landing ships.
Speaking at the time that selection of the Damen design was announced, chief of naval operations Admiral Daryl Caudle said: “A year ago, the US Navy cancelled the LSM request for proposals, when the conceptual design produced bids that were simply unaffordable. We applied common sense, went back to basics, and reassessed the programme.
“We identified existing, proven designs that meet the concept of operations requirements, and then scrutinised them for producibility.”
Secretary Phelan said with the LSM decision the US Navy is “fundamentally reshaping how the Navy builds and fields its fleet”, making what he called an “operationally driven and fiscally disciplined choice”. He said with the LSM the US Navy has – for the first time – adopted what he described as a “build to print approach” that drives down cost, schedule and technical risks.
Commandant of the Marine Corps General Eric Smith said: “For the Marine Corps, the LST100 will provide an organic littoral capability in the Indo Pacific and around the world. It will provide us with a critical, inter-theatre manoeuvre asset that is able to embark and transport marines, weapons, supplies and equipment, without requiring access to a pier.”
The Secretary of the Navy described the LST100 as a 4,000tonne design, with a range of more than 3,400nm “that gives us the right balance of affordability, capability and speed”. General Smith said the LST 100’s cargo capacity, helicopter capacity and crane “make it an excellent choice for the Marine Corps’ requirement of no less than 35 medium landing ships to support naval expeditionary forces.”
Admiral Caudle said the US Navy “is incorporating a disciplined set of class standard equipment, so that the ships will be maintainable, repairable and able to meet operational availability targets”.
In July 2025, Damen received a technical data package award from NAVSEA for the LST100, and that design has now been selected as the basis for the LSM, all of which will be constructed at American yards.
The Dutch company describes the LST100 as 100.68m in length with a beam of 16m and a draught of 3.58m. Able to support a wide range of operations, with the ability to transport personnel, vehicles, equipment and cargo, the design has accommodation for 282 Marine Corps personnel.
The vessel can transit at speeds of up to 14knots, with an endurance speed of 10knots, and a range of up to 7,530nm. The LST100 is also a highly flexible unit, with a modular design that enables straightforward adaptation and upgrade without compromising the benefits of standardisation.
December 2025 saw Belgian shipowner Somtrans christen its latest delivery, the estuary-class bunker barge United LNG I, in a ceremony hosted at the Port of Antwerp. The family-run company plans to put the barge into service in February 2026, where it will be used to fulfil growing demand for LNG bunkering in various Belgian and Dutch seaports, a spokesperson for Somtrans confirms.
The 135m x 21.46m vessel has been designed for both inland waterways and coastal service up to the Port of Zeebrugge. The barge’s construction was an international affair: the hull was built in China and then transported to the Netherlands for outfitting. Here, RensenDriessen, a shipyard-independent, Dutch newbuild projects specialist, acted as the main contractor, with Heusden-based TeamCo Shipyard overseeing tank integration, engineering and final outfitting of the vessel.
Italian engineering firm Gas and Heat, which specialises in designing and building cryogenic tank systems and LNG-fuel supply systems for maritime applications, supplied the barge’s eight cylindrical, single-walled Type C LNG tanks. Each LNG tank features a capacity of 1,000m3 and has been engineered to store this alt-fuel at -165°C, and with a boil-off rate of 0.30% per day.
The tanks are pressure-rated 400kPa. According to Somtrans, the tanks will remain closed during operations, monitored by pressure and temperature sensors, and will only require direct internal checks during the barge’s five-year class inspections. The vessel’s eight cargo pumps are each rated 165m3 per hour. The barge’s LNG bunker arm measures 25m in length and has a capacity of 920m3 per hour.
Somtrans says that the completion of United LNG I ndicates how the model of hull construction in China, followed by final outfitting in Western Europe, is becoming increasingly common in European shortsea shipping.
Wim Driessen, MD of RensenDriessen, comments: “By combining efficient hull construction in China with local outfitting in Western Europe, we are now offering our hull-building expertise more widely to the shortsea shipping segment. These cylindrical LNG tanks take this project into new territory: integrating them at this scale is unique. It shows what is possible when a shipowner, contractor and yard work as one team.” TeamCo Shipyard MD Marcel Zweers adds: “This was not a standard build. The LNG systems, the tank integration, the bunkering equipment, all demanded precision.”
United LNG I features a moulded depth of 7.5m and a draught of approximately 4m, and is arranged to accommodate a crew of six. Onboard tank capacities include: 5,113m3 of ballast water; 30m3 of fresh water; and approximately 39.7m3 of fuel oil, split between one fore tank (1.7m3) and two aft tanks (19m3 each). This latter arrangement reflects the positioning of the engines, which include four MAN Rollo LNG models, each rated 525kW, at the fore of the vessel and two 800kW diesel generators and a single 117kW auxiliary diesel generator at its aft. The barge also carries two battery packs, each rated 200kWh.
Propulsion-wise, the barge incorporates two main azimuth thrusters, rated 1,305kW apiece and featuring propeller diameters of 1,900mm. These are complemented by a pair of 550kW bow thrusters.
Somtrans is now expecting delivery of a second sister barge, also under build at TeamCo Shipyard, aligned to plans to extend its bunkering capacity within the Amsterdam-Rotterdam-Antwerp (ARA) region. “This comes as LNG bunker demand in Northwest Europe continues to expand, driven by new dual-fuel tonnage in the container, tanker, bulk, ro-ro and cruise segments,” the Somtrans spokesperson explains. “The global fleet of LNG-fuelled vessels continues to grow by double digits each year, driven by owners seeking cleaner operations and reliable access to alternative fuels.”
TeamCo Shipyard’s Zweers says that outfitting of the forthcoming sister, United LNG II, will commence in March 2026.
Already under construction at Manor Marine, with a scheduled launch date of June 2026, the first Oceanus17 will “have a flavour of the military about it, but be very much a dual-role vessel,” Matthew Ratsey, founder and MD of ZeroUSV, says. “The feedback we’re getting from wind farm service operators is that they want to increasingly use remote-operated vehicles [ROVs], and the Oceanus17 can function as a ‘mothership’ to launch and recover ROVs, and as a ‘comms node’, tracking the ROVs’ positions when they are deployed – which has massive benefits in not losing a single ROV.”
Ratsey adds that ZeroUSV was recently approached by a company that manages the offshore facilities for several energy majors, with a view to using a fleet of USVs to deliver post and spares to these sites, as a cost-efficient alternative to expensive helicopter hire. This is a task the forthcoming Oceanus17 could easily handle given its aft deck payload capacity of 4tonnes, Ratsey points out.
Oceanus17 will comprise an all-aluminium, 16.97m x 3.17m monohull with the ability to maintain range for more than 50 days.
One of ZeroUSV’s goals was to “compress traditional defence acquisition timelines”, where the journey from design to prototype can roll on for years, Ratsey notes. So, for the Oceanus17, ZeroUSV chose to use a ‘spiral development process’, accelerating the design, engineering and build phase by basing the new model heavily on the Oceanus12 – essentially treating the existing USV as a ‘building block’ for the newer, bigger model.
Ratsey elaborates: “We’ve taken most of the core engineering we used for the Oceanus12 – what we know works and is reliable – and asked ourselves, what is the biggest vessel we can build with this engineering package? This includes the engines, the batteries, the battery chargers and the generators used in the Oceanus12 – we designed enough capacity into those components the first time around, we can reuse them in the Oceanus17.”
Another benefit of the spiral development process is that, by using the same components as the Oceanus12, end users can utilise the same spares packages with the newer model. USV familiarisation is another bonus. The biggest boon, though, from a USV manufacturer’s perspective, is perhaps the ability to speed up necessary certification. Ratsey explains: “The fact that we’re using 95% of the same equipment from the Oceanus12 on the Oceanus17 means that, when we come to enter the Maritime and Coastguard Agency [MCA] Workboat Code 3 process, all our current mitigations and submissions are transferrable – they just apply to a slightly larger version of the vessel.”
The Oceanus17’s payload bay will measure 9m x 2.8m, and will have the capacity to accommodate a 20’ container, with power and data connection points. The USV will also feature Starlink and Iridium connectivity and will incorporate an autonomous software package provided by ZeroUSV’s long-term partner Marine AI – rated to level 4 autonomy, but future-proofed for further upgrades. In addition to the boat’s primary sensors, customers will be able to select FLIR thermal IP cameras and W-band HD radar, among other options.
While Manor Marine puts the USV together, working with materials and components pre-issued by ZeroUSV, an independent contractor will oversee the boat’s electrical fit-out. If all goes to plan, the Oceanus17 will be launched in time for this year’s Seawork expo, to be hosted in Southampton, UK between 9-11 June. Then, in July, the boat will be certified by MECAL to meet the MCA Workboat Code 3, Annex II requirements for uncrewed vessels and unlimited operations.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
text one
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum.
There’s a phrase I now hear more often when discussing future submarines – we’ll just add autonomy. It sounds harmless, logical even, but it makes a misleading assumption shaping how we think about next-generation submarine design. Autonomy isn’t something we can simply add and, if we treat it that way, we risk getting it wrong.
Autonomy is already moving beyond isolated subsystems into core control and combat functions, filtering data, generating predictions and influencing decisions. As outlined in my ongoing work (to be presented at the RINA Warship Conference in Bath in June), this fundamentally changes the role of the operator and introduces Human–Autonomy Teaming (HAT) as a primary design driver. It also raises trust and reliability, not as abstract qualities, but as design requirements that must be engineered from the outset.
For decades, submarine design has followed a stable model: the platform senses, the crew interprets and the crew decides. Systems support that process, but they don’t challenge it. With HAT, autonomy becomes part of decision-making – control is no longer purely human and, critically, it’s not binary. This introduces a new layer of complexity that must be addressed through system architecture and platform design progressing in harmony.
Take the control room as an example. There’s a tendency to equate digitalisation with more screens and more data. But submariners don’t need more information, they need clarity. Trust in autonomous systems comes from transparency of intent, consistency of behaviour and clearly communicated confidence and limitations. If autonomy cannot do this under pressure, it is not adding capability, it is adding risk!
In my view, current approaches need refinement. We often design systems and then ask operators to adapt. In a constrained, high-tempo and unforgiving environment, that is not viable. Human factors must be treated as a core design input, ensuring interaction between the operator and the system drives performance, rather than undermining it.
Authority management is another area requiring care. In a HAT-enabled system, the question of who is in control becomes fluid. That fluidity must be engineered, not assumed, with clear boundaries, predictable transitions and unambiguous override mechanisms forming part of a reliable and trusted system architecture.
HAT cannot be treated as a software or integration problem alone; it is a naval architectural issue. It affects control spaces, system structures, function allocation and the relationship between vessel, crew and the wider operational network. To deliver this effectively, platform design, system architecture and human considerations need to evolve together. Increasing technical capability does not automatically translate into operational effectiveness.
Submariners already operate at the limits of human performance. Introducing autonomy without properly integrating it into the human system risks increasing cognitive load, reducing situational awareness and complicating error recovery at critical moments. Reliability, in this context, is not just about system uptime, but about predictable, understandable behaviour in demanding conditions.
Autonomy is widely expected to play a role in future submarine design. The key consideration will be how thoughtfully and effectively it is integrated, particularly in a way that fosters trust between human and machine. If we treat autonomy as something that can be added late, we risk building submarines that are technically advanced but operationally brittle. If we recognise HAT as a core design consideration, and ensure architecture, platform and human factors develop concurrently, there is an opportunity to deliver submarines that are more resilient, more usable and ultimately safer.
That’s the distinction that matters, because in a submarine, complexity doesn’t fail gracefully.
Author profile
James Gladman MRINA, chief engineer, naval architecture and platform design, Expleo UK.
This article appeared in Opinion, TNA May-June 2026.
NATO established the Baltic Sentry mission in 2025 to address the vulnerability of critical undersea infrastructure in the Baltic Sea. The region contains a dense network of power interconnectors, fibre-optic cables, and seabed installations that have been repeatedly affected by ambiguous or hostile activity.
The accession of Finland and Sweden to NATO transformed the Baltic into an almost entirely Alliance-controlled maritime space, creating both the political impetus and operational requirement for a coordinated, persistent security posture.
Task Force X (TFX) provides the principal mechanism for integrating maritime uncrewed systems into Baltic Sentry. Its mandate is to deliver scalable USVs, UUVs, and UASs that can augment or substitute for traditional platforms, particularly in the demanding acoustic and environmental conditions of the Baltic. Crewed patrol vessels and maritime patrol aircraft cannot sustain the level of persistence required to monitor multiple infrastructure corridors; TFX assets, by contrast, offer endurance, sensing diversity, and the ability to saturate key areas. Early contributions such as small UAVs, medium UUVs, and basic USVs, provided incremental improvements, while later additions such as interceptor USVs, sail-powered USVs, and containerised towed arrays significantly expanded Blue’s ability to inspect vessels and monitor infrastructure.
![]() |
|---|
The NATO Digital Ocean programme provides the architectural framework for integrating these systems. It aims to create a “persistent, multidomain sensing and data fusion architecture” by combining seabed sensors, autonomous platforms, satellite ISR, and commercial data sources. A major focus is underwater communications, long recognised as a limiting factor in submerged operations. Prototype underwater mesh networks, acoustic modems, and hybrid optical acoustic links were explored during the wargame series, representing early steps towards a distributed, data-centric maritime surveillance model.
The wargames were conducted using UCL’s Cobalt Rocks ruleset, adapted to model physics-based detection, communications latency, bandwidth constraints and probabilistic classification. Three scenarios were constructed: a 2025 baseline, an initial TFX-enhanced posture, and a future Digital Ocean architecture incorporating an ASW glider barrier. A double blind adjudication model ensured realistic uncertainty, with Blue and Red operating from separate rooms and receiving only information their sensors could plausibly observe. Environmental conditions, endurance limits, and launch and recovery constraints were explicitly modelled, reinforcing operational realism.
Scenario 1 established the baseline. Blue possessed reasonable surface awareness but “almost no persistent subsurface sensing”, enabling Red to use a seabed operations vessel as a decoy while a grey zone merchant vessel severed a fibre-optic cable. The attack went undetected until after the fact, and attribution remained uncertain. The scenario highlighted the difficulty of distinguishing hostile intent from routine commercial activity in a congested maritime environment and showed the vulnerability of the current posture to deception and timing manipulation.
![]() |
![]() |
|---|
Scenario 2 introduced initial TFX enhancements. UAVs extended patrol vessel horizons, USVs increased surface domain presence, and medium UUVs provided limited subsurface coverage. Red abandoned at least one planned attack due to the perceived risk of inspection. However, underwater situational awareness remained intermittent, and a Red MUUV successfully exploited a gap in Blue’s patrol cycle. The absence of an underwater comms network meant that even successful detections would not have been reported in time to prevent an attack.
Scenario 3 tested a future architecture featuring a digital underwater mesh network, expanded TFX mass, and an ASW glider barrier. The mesh network enabled near real-time reporting and dynamic tasking of submerged assets. The glider barrier successfully detected a Red SSK, allowing Blue to mount a coordinated non-kinetic response. However, Red’s multivector attack, which combined MUUVs, an XLUUV decoy, and a grey zone merchant vessel, showed that even advanced architectures remain vulnerable to coverage gaps and information environment manipulation. The ‘Visby incident’, in which a merchant vessel severed all fibre-optic cables to the island, illustrated the interplay between physical, legal and informational domains.
Underwater situational awareness remained the dominant limitation across all scenarios, driven by the Baltic’s shallow depths, variable salinity and complex seabed topography. Platform mass and distribution significantly shaped adversary freedom of manoeuvre, but mass alone was insufficient without optimised tasking. Communications proved a critical enabler; the mesh network dramatically improved responsiveness but remained sensitive to node density and environmental conditions. Endurance constraints created predictable windows of vulnerability, repeatedly exploited by Red.
The wargame series demonstrates that future capability development must prioritise persistent seabed sensing, long endurance UUVs, resilient underwater communications, and integrated system of systems architectures. Incremental improvements to individual platforms will not deliver the situational awareness required to protect critical undersea infrastructure in the Baltic Sea.
|
The article above is an abridged version of a paper presented by Professor David Manley from University College London at RINA Warship 2026. |
Under water capabilityThe Warship 2026 conference brought together naval designers, engineers, defence professionals, academics and industry specialists to examine the technologies and strategies shaping future submarine capability.
The theme, accelerating underwater capability through collaboration, ran through a programme covering technology insertion, digitalisation and digital twins, autonomy and human-autonomy teaming, lean crewing, innovative power and propulsion systems, novel materials, survivability, stealth, and quantum technology.
Sessions were drawn from a range of organisations, including BMT, QinetiQ, Siemens Digital Industries Software, Expleo and MARIN, as well as universities such as Adelaide and University College London. The format combined keynote addresses, parallel technical streams, Q&A panels, and roundtable discussions, with a drinks reception and wargaming activity on the first evening. BMT was the event partner. |
|---|
This article appeared in Events, TNA May/June 2026.
Ulf Hansen, senior advisor maritime at Swedish company I-Tech AB, addressed the RINA Ship Energy Efficiency Conference in Athens in March 2026 with a data-driven challenge to the growing regulatory momentum towards biocide-free antifouling. His answer was unambiguous: yes, biocides remain essential, and prematurely restricting them risks making shipping’s environmental performance significantly worse, not better.
The scale of the problem
An estimated 200 million tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions annually are attributable to biofouling resistance, representing around 20% of total shipping emissions. A complete absence of effective antifouling protection could push that figure to 400 million tonnes. Even modest fouling carries severe consequences: coating roughness or light slime increases fuel consumption by up to 25%, heavy slime by 25-35%, and small barnacles or weed by 35-55%. By 2050, uncontrolled biofouling could be responsible for a 19% rise in total shipping CO₂ emissions. Hull fouling is also the single largest pathway for non-indigenous species entering European waters, accounting for 41% of the total. Approximately 95% of the global fleet relies on biocidal coatings, a proven, fleet-scale solution across more than 100,000 vessels worldwide.
In his presentation Hansen used drydock inspection data, compiled with Safinah Group, to challenge assumptions widely held in industry and regulatory circles.
![]() |
|---|
The first is that barnacle fouling primarily affects slow-steaming or low-activity vessels. The data show otherwise. Barnacle presence was recorded on 89.9% of product tanker hulls inspected, 88.4% of crude tankers, and 71.9% of containerships. Vessels reporting significant barnacle fouling across the global merchant fleet grew from 249 in 2020 to 685 in 2025, a near-tripling in five years. This data is based on 685 vessels’ in-dock data during physical inspection.
The key driver is trading pattern, not activity level: tankers and chemical carriers operating in warm, nutrient-rich waters with extended anchorage and frequent idle phases below 6knots are roughly twice as likely to suffer heavy fouling as high-activity vessels. As global sea temperatures rise, this pressure will intensify.
The second assumption is that barnacle fouling concentrates on vertical hull sides. Inspection data show the flat bottom is in fact more severely affected, with direct implications for hull cleaning strategies and coating specification.
The third is that fouling is primarily a consequence of coating failure. While polish-through correlates with increased barnacle levels, significant fouling is recorded even on hulls with no polish-through, confirming that operational exposure is an independent risk factor that coating selection alone cannot fully mitigate.
The available biocide toolbox is limited and shrinking, just when fouling pressures are increasing. Among targeted hard-fouling biocides, only two active ingredients are currently available: tralopyril and medetomidine. Hansen also notes that most commercially successful foul-release coatings still incorporate biocidal active ingredients.
A biocide ban, even phased, would leave self-polishing coating systems without their primary defence against barnacle settlement, while foul-release systems would become highly vulnerable in warm-water idle conditions. The result would be increased fouling, more aggressive hull cleaning, and a carbon paradox in which the regulatory measure intended to reduce environmental impact would increase fuel consumption, worsen CII ratings, raise EU ETS costs and elevate invasive species risk.
A call for collaboration
Hansen’s conclusion is that a biocide-free future is not yet realistic for most of the fleet. His call is for a more sophisticated response: regulators and industry should evaluate biocide policy jointly and holistically, considering emissions to both air and sea, rather than proceeding substance by substance. Rising sea temperatures and their effect on fouling pressure require proper investigation before further restrictions are imposed.
Looking beyond the binary framing of biocidal versus non-biocidal, he advocates collaborative innovation towards ultra-low-biocide formulations that minimise chemical load while maintaining efficacy across all vessel types and operational conditions. The goal is to ensure the path away from biocides does not inadvertently worsen the very environmental outcomes it seeks to improve.
This article appeared in Technical, TNA May-June 2026.
Wärtsilä, the Helsinki-based technology group, has released NTPRO 7, the latest iteration of its navigational training simulation platform, designed to address the growing complexity of modern bridge operations and the accelerating pace of digital navigation standards.
The platform received a Statement of Compliance from DNV ahead of its commercial launch, which was scheduled for May 2026, following two years of piloting and validation.
Central to the new release is the RealSea visualisation engine, built on Unreal Engine 5 and paired with an advanced sound system to deliver a physically accurate, high-fidelity training environment. New-generation conning and overhead displays mirror contemporary shipboard systems, and the platform incorporates S-100-ready digital navigation training through Wärtsilä’s Navi-Sailor ECDIS.
NTPRO 7 introduces a Virtual Watchkeeper with AI-powered voice command recognition, alongside vessel models and training scenarios supporting wind-assisted propulsion systems.
Johan Ekvall, director of simulation and training at Wärtsilä Marine, said the platform had been developed to help training institutions respond to evolving regulatory expectations and vessel technologies. “NTPRO 7 is designed to help training institutions and academies prepare crews for changes by providing a future-ready simulation environment that mirrors modern bridge operations and supports long-term competence development,” he said.
The system is offered in scalable configurations, from full-mission bridge simulators to classroom-based setups, enabling institutions to tailor deployments to their infrastructure and instructional requirements.
This article appeared in Insights, TNA May/June 2026
The Royal Navy, like many Western fleets, faces a structural problem that has been building for decades. Warship numbers have declined as unit costs have risen, creating a force structure built around a small number of highly capable but scarce platforms. Fewer hulls mean reduced presence, less resilience to losses and limited ability to surge in a crisis. Meanwhile, personnel recruitment and retention are under growing strain, and the shipbuilding capacity of potential adversaries dwarfs that of the West.
The UK’s 2025 Strategic Defence Review confronted this reality, setting out a vision for a ‘hybrid navy’ in which crewed platforms are complemented – and in some roles replaced – by uncrewed and autonomous systems operating at scale. First Sea Lord General Sir Gwyn Jenkins has since framed this transition as existential, warning that a force that waits for autonomous technology to fully mature before integrating it risks being outpaced by adversaries.
BMT believes the answer lies not in building more of the same, but in rethinking the vessel entirely. Project MODUS, presented at UDT 2026, sets out a family of modular uncrewed surface vessels conceived from first principles around autonomous operation. The work, led by maritime autonomous systems engineering lead Chloe Yarrien and head of innovation and research Jake Rigby, draws on more than five years of BMT research and development, including programmes into lean-crewed platforms and large uncrewed surface vessel concepts.
A family of platforms
MODUS is not a single vessel but a coherent design philosophy expressed across multiple hull sizes, from a 15m pentamaran to a 40m medium uncrewed surface vessel and a 75m large uncrewed surface vessel. Rather than pursuing a multi-role design that attempts to do everything at the cost of doing nothing well, MODUS embraces role-optimised platforms, tailored to specific operational needs.
Here we focus on three underwater warfare use cases: military data gathering, seabed warfare and anti-submarine warfare. Six core design principles run through every variant: autonomy, modularity, availability, buildability, adaptability and affordability. The first and last are perhaps the most consequential.
![]() |
|---|
Autonomy is a primary design driver, not a retrofit. Every decision about hull form, internal arrangement, systems architecture and maintenance philosophy flows from the requirement to operate without crew. Affordability, meanwhile, is framed as a strategic imperative. Uncrewed vessels that simply replicate the cost of crewed ships will not solve the combat mass problem; they will compound it.
Designed around the mission
The three underwater vignettes drive specific and practical design choices. Long endurance, a common requirement across all three, shapes the hull form directly. Narrow-beam, low-resistance hull forms are matched to their intended operational profiles. With no crew onboard, internal volume freed from habitability can be reallocated to fuel, though weight rather than space becomes the limiting constraint. Critically, endurance for an autonomous vessel is defined largely by maintenance intervals, and MODUS targets operational periods of up to 60 days through simplified propulsion, appropriate redundancy, and equipment designed to be removed and serviced on the quayside rather than onboard.
Flexible multi-domain surveillance, relevant to the data-gathering and seabed warfare roles, is enabled through a dedicated sonar gondola integrated into the medium vessel. The gondola is optimised for sensor performance and doubles as a stabilising keel. Controlling self-noise is identified as fundamental to underwater performance, and low underwater radiated noise need not drive excessive cost if acoustic performance is addressed early in the design process, rather than managed as an expensive retrofit.
For the larger vessel, Navy Persistent Operational Deployment Systems (PODS) integration extends multi-domain flexibility further. True PODS integration is more than simply providing deck space for containers. It requires designed-in access, deployment envelopes, and mechanical, electrical and data interfaces so that mission systems become integral elements of the ship architecture. Offboard systems, including inspection ROVs deployed via a moonpool, towed arrays, survey UUVs, sonobuoys and gliders, extend the sensor field without increasing crew demand.
The large uncrewed surface vessel variant, intended for year-round North Atlantic operations in support of anti-submarine warfare, is around 75m following seakeeping analysis supported by historic towing tank data.
Steel is cheap and air is free, and the operational benefit of improved seakeeping in the North Atlantic far outweighs the marginal increase in material cost. BMT proposes a stepping-stone delivery model, beginning with medium vessel deployments in UK waters on lower-risk tasks, building operational confidence before scaling to larger vessels in more demanding theatres.
Commercial uses
The MODUS family has clear dual-use potential, with the modular autonomous design applicable to offshore survey, infrastructure inspection and logistics, offering a route to drive down unit cost through wider commercial adoption.
The fundamental argument of MODUS is straightforward: autonomous vessels must not be seen as direct replacements for crewed ships. They must deliver genuinely different capability, at lower through-life cost, and at the scale needed to restore meaningful combat mass to the fleet.
Author profiles
Chloe Yarrien, maritime autonomous systems engineering lead, BMT; Jake Rigby FRINA, head of innovation and research, BMT
This article appeared in Technical, TNA May/June 2026.
Capturing actionable seabed intelligence in environments that defeat conventional survey spreads is forcing a rethink of platform architecture and sensor integration. That was the challenge facing Seaforth Geosurveys while assessing the Arctic seabed for a planned subsea fibre-optic cable installation in Ungava Bay, Canada.
The Nunavik EAUFON-3 project was spearheaded by Sulmara, a global seabed intelligence company, which specialises in capturing and interpreting high-quality offshore subsea data.
Sulmara’s answer was its Discover package, a bespoke technology stack combining a high-resolution 3D synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) sub-bottom system with inertial navigation and positioning sensors.
This was mounted on a specialised remotely operated uncrewed surface vessel (USV) to acquire data, with in-house software used for processing, interpretation and delivery.
Sulmara Discover can be operated both locally and over-the-horizon from a Remote Operations Centre in Glasgow, UK.
For projects such as Nunavik EAUFON-3, platform selection is central. Sulmara chose Ocean Power Technologies’ wave adaptive modular vehicle, WAM-V 16, a USV with an articulated, wave-adaptive frame and shallow draught.
![]() |
|---|
“The WAM-V 16 USV was chosen for the integration mainly due to its motion compensating frame and versatility as a platform to meet host specifications for our technology,” says Kevin Rychert, principal acoustic scientist at Sulmara.
“Its independent wave compensating hulls allow it to adapt to sea states that would typically shut down smaller USVs’ surveys.”
He adds that the gimbled payload bay provides the stability critical for this type of work. “Other larger USVs don’t have this stability even with roll stabilisers,” he says.
WAM-V 16 is designed for small to medium-sized marine data projects and is a powerful survey tool, whether acting independently or complementing other vessels as a force multiplier.
Modularity and integration
Equally important is modularity. Unlike conventional hulls with fixed payload volumes, the WAM-V architecture allows rapid sensor integration without extensive redesign.
“The modularity of the WAM-V provides a great platform for developments and new technology integration as it is not constrained to small payload bays that are specifically designed to fit within a fabricated hull design,” says Rychert. “This allows us to add and integrate whatever sensors we need, quickly and easily without many architectural constraints.”
Key to the project was equipping the WAM-V 16 with the EdgeTech Buried Object Sonar System (eBOSS).
eBOSS can produce high-resolution, three-dimensional sub-bottom data across large tidal ranges and it can cope with cable routes littered with boulders above and below the seabed.
Full-volume sub-bottom data set at 5cm resolution is collected across a 120° swathe, enabling rapid coverage over large areas.
Rychert says that no other sonar system available can image the sub-seabed at this resolution, swathe width and depth in real time.
What differentiates the system is the coupling of sensing, navigation and processing. For naval architects, the integration elevates requirements around power management, data handling, onboard computer and communications bandwidth. In this sense, the USV becomes an active node within a distributed sensing network, rather than a passive survey platform.
The design integration is the culmination of years of work through R&D, sea trials and technology integration. “Discover combines the lightest and smallest 3D SAS SBI (eBOSS) on the market with the highest quality INS and GNSS sensors in a uniquely stable unmanned platform,” says Rychert.
The software doesn’t just record data; it integrates with the USV’s autonomous communication capabilities to provide real-time volumetric rendering.
![]() |
|---|
This allows operators to adjust path based on the quality of the incoming data, ensuring coverage and quality certainty without manual post-processing delays.
Rychert explains that the USV and Sulmara Discover pair so well that they have now been integrated on other variants of the WAM-V, most recently the larger 22ft version.
A changing methodology
The EAUFON-3 project is a benchmark for subsea surveys in general, Rychert says, and signals a methodological shift. Conventional ROV or ROTV surveys maintain a fixed altitude; a surface-mounted system must manage highly variable stand-off distances while maintaining data consistency.
But this survey was different. With water depths shifting dramatically from less than 1m to 20m, the project required continuous sensor adjustment and an entirely new approach to eBOSS data processing.
“As we move to surface-mounted systems, the challenge is interpreting datasets acquired at a dynamic range in a single pass without platform changes,” says Rychert.
A wider application
The WAM-V 16 USV and the Sulmara Discover package have a much wider application across the offshore technology and subsea sectors.
They can be used to survey any buried object such as pipelines and cables, unexploded ordinance, hazardous/lost debris and shipwrecks.
“The aim is to deliver the same insight that end clients need through faster automated, lower cost and higher quality technology and vehicle design methods,” says Rychert.
“Enabling a USV workforce with new emerging technologies can help achieve this in a safer, greener way.
“Discover has the potential to disrupt the subsea survey industry. Adding automation from AI and machine learning to this package further pushes the quality and efficiency we can deliver,” he says.
Projects such as Nunavik EAUFON-3 signal a structural shift in offshore vessel and technology design. Stability is being engineered for sensor performance as much as seakeeping; modularity is becoming essential and autonomy introduces new demands on control systems, redundancy and communications resilience.
Perhaps most significantly, though, the boundary between vessel and payload is dissolving.
Hull form, structural arrangement, power systems and communications architecture must now be conceived as part of an integrated design platform, optimised for data acquisition, processing and transmission, as much as for propulsion.
This article appeared in Subsea surveys, TNA May/June 2026.
The company
Argo Engineering Solutions, founded in 2016 by Simon Walley and based at Hythe Marina, Southampton, is a 12-strong team specialising in lightweight structures across composites, aluminium and high-strength steels. The company’s work spans five pillars of expertise: advanced structures, prototyping, high-speed light craft, windships, and hovercraft and air cushion vehicles.
The engineer
Emma Shepherd is one of Argo’s five engineering consultants, and her career illustrates how the company develops its people. Having completed an MEng (Hons) in Marine Technology with Small Craft Technology at Newcastle University in 2020, she had already spent two summers with Argo as an intern before joining as a design engineer, progressing to engineering consultant in September 2024.
Her technical experience encompasses naval architecture and hydrodynamics on concept projects, preliminary design of RIBs to various rule sets, structural assessment against ISO standards, stability assessments, lifting calculations, weight-critical studies and hoverbarge stability feasibility work. She has developed proficiency in finite element analysis using Strand7 and is practised in hand calculations for hull structures across monohull and catamaran configurations.
Her portfolio reflects the kind of multidisciplinary, hands-on engineering career that professional chartership is designed to recognise.
She says: “I am looking for an experienced RINA member who has worked on a range of projects and understands the chartership process – someone who could help me review my application and offer guidance and feedback on what I have prepared so far.”
What is needed
Shepherd is now preparing her chartership application, and it is here that a gap has emerged, not in her experience, but in the support available to her.
Argo has not previously navigated the RINA chartership process, and there are open questions around how to collate experience and present it in the format RINA requires. What is needed is someone who understands the process from the inside: how evidence should be structured, what level of detail is expected and how a candidate’s career narrative should be framed to meet the Institution’s standards.
What Argo can offer
Mentoring is already part of the fabric of how Argo operates. The four most senior staff, with between 15 and 30 years of experience each, provide active technical guidance to junior engineers. With six years post-graduation experience herself, Shepherd is well placed to support the four recently graduated engineers who have joined the company in the past three years.
Argo also offers work experience and internships to undergraduates, providing experience that contributes directly to logbook objectives. Once Shepherd achieves chartership, she will be glad to act as an external mentor to candidates at other organisations.
A mentor who knows the RINA process and can help Shepherd present an already strong engineering career in the right way would benefit not just one engineer, but an entire company’s approach to professional development for years to come.
Get in touch: info@argo-engineering.co.uk
This article appeared in Members, TNA May/June 2026.
DeepOcean has demonstrated a methodology for combining subsea inspection and full 3D scanning into a single remotely supported ROV campaign, completing both scopes simultaneously across 69 subsea structures at Woodside Energy’s Sangomar deepwater field off the coast of Senegal.
Routine subsea inspection and structural 3D scanning are traditionally conducted as sequential, discrete operations, each requiring dedicated offshore mobilisation. By integrating them into a single campaign, DeepOcean completed the combined work in slightly more than half the vessel time that two separate operations would have demanded, while doubling the data output delivered to the operator.
The technical capability underpinning the campaign draws on a proprietary ecosystem that DeepOcean has developed over the past decade. The operational package encompasses inspection engineers and ROV pilots working with ROVs equipped with specialist scanning hardware, integrated with data processing software capable of exploiting computer-aided drawings, ROV footage and sonar returns. A proprietary 3D imaging software pipeline converts the combined data into full 3D models, with digital twin outputs generated for ongoing asset management.
Key to the methodology is photogrammetry, the extraction of precise spatial measurements and 3D information from 2D photographic data. The discipline combines optics, geometry, computer vision and imaging science to convert ROV footage and survey data into accurate 3D reconstructions of subsea infrastructure. Applied at Sangomar, this enabled the capture of high-resolution structural data that supports detailed planning for future inspection and maintenance activities across the field.
“By applying 3D reconstructions in our operations, we improve our capacity to detect structural anomalies like cracks or deformities and understand their proximity to critical components,” said DeepOcean CEO Øyvind Mikaelsen. “This enables timely maintenance and prevents failures.”
The Sangomar Phase 1 Development lies around 100km south of Dakar in water depths characteristic of deepwater operations. Production commenced in June 2024, making this baseline survey campaign a timely exercise in establishing the structural reference data from which future inspection findings will be benchmarked. The 69 structures surveyed included 17 subsea trees.
DeepOcean was already engaged at Sangomar under a broader subsea inspection, maintenance and repair contract.
The Sangomar campaign will be watched closely by operators seeking to reduce vessel day counts without compromising the quality or scope of subsea inspection programmes, a pressure that is only increasing as deepwater portfolios expand and cost discipline intensifies across the sector.
This article appeared in Insights, TNA May/June 2026
David Andrews is professor of engineering design at University College London. His MoD career encompassed nuclear submarine design, the Invincible class aircraft carriers and early concept work on HMS Albion, HMS Bulwark and HMS Ocean. In 2020, RINA awarded him the William Froude Medal, its highest individual honour.
Why a career in naval architecture?
I have wanted to design ships since before I was eight when I was driving a pilot cutter in the summer of 1955 in the Bay of Port Philip, off Melbourne.
How has the industry changed since you started – for better and worse?
The ‘them and us’ between the management and the blue collar workforce used to be appalling, but the industry is now a cooperative endeavour where skills are respected, even if the City and government fail to recognise its worth.
What’s the most underrated skill in naval architecture?
Modern naval architects are highly capable users of computer-based technologies but lack the sense of life at sea for our end users. I was, as a naval constructor, educated in part alongside the Royal Navy and went to sea with them before designing ships and submarines. That time took in frigates, including full work-up and service off Iceland during the 1971 Cod War, a mine hunter, submarines, and a helicopter carrier.
Who in the industry do you most admire, and why?
Young women naval architects, whose excellent personal management qualities are sorely needed.
Which vessel do you wish you’d worked on, and why?
The 1950s Dreadnought submarine project with its lead designer, Louis Rydill. He was my professor at UCL and later my PhD supervisor and he had a profound understanding of ship design.
What’s the best advice you have ever received and who gave it?
Louis Rydill had a phrase in judging the professionalism of colleagues in the wider profession and the measure of working with them. He said: “His heart is in the right place.” And it was the correct basis for good collaborative working, which is the essence of designing complex vessels.
If you could collaborate with a naval architect from history, who would it be?
I am torn between three. First, Louis Rydill. Second, Sir Rowland Baker, whose career from the start of the Second World War to directing both the Dreadnought and Polaris submarine projects showed that technical design skill needs to be matched by management of a project’s acquisition strategy. Third, Sir Stanley Goodall, director of naval construction from 1936 to 1944.
|
LEARNING POINTS
Do your best But don’t succeed at the cost to your integrity.
“His heart is in the right place” Louis Rydill’s phrase is a good basis for collaborative working.
Design your ship inside out As examined in David Andrews’ article, The Sophistication of ESD of Complex Vessels. |
|---|
What’s the biggest mistake you’ve made in your career, and what did it teach you?
Having witnessed, under protest, the mendacity of the senior administrators and the indifference of the uniform navy to the fate of the Royal Corps of Naval Constructors (RCNC), I finished my government service saddened by the state of the once proud Royal Navy and its ships.
The RCNC has a distinguished history stretching back centuries, and to see its standing deliberately diminished was deeply dispiriting. It taught me that our national decline was significantly due to engineers being denied the status that they need to exploit the talent that has been emasculated since the time of Brunel.
What advice would you give your 25-year-old self?
Do your best, but don’t succeed at the cost to your integrity.
If you had a naval architect motto, what would it be?
I wrote a paper 100 Things (or so) A Ship Designer Needs to Know that is full of mottos.
This article appeared in Members, TNA May/June 2026.
Fincantieri has announced it will build Spectre, a new class of high-speed multi-mission unmanned surface vessel (USV) developed by Saildrone, through its US subsidiary Fincantieri Marine Group. The collaboration was announced at the Navy League’s Sea-Air-Space exhibition at National Harbor, Maryland.
At approximately 52m in length, with a displacement of around 250tonnes and a top speed of 30knots, Spectre is the largest, fastest and most capable Saildrone platform to date. Optimised for anti-submarine warfare operations, the vessel offers extreme endurance and an ultra-quiet acoustic signature, while remaining adaptable to alternative mission configurations, including higher-speed and low-observable operational profiles.
Construction will take place at Fincantieri’s shipyards in Wisconsin, applying the group’s established industrialised shipbuilding methods and serial production expertise in advanced aluminium vessels to a next-generation autonomous platform. The programme is designed to deliver production continuity and industrial robustness alongside technological performance, reflecting growing demand from naval forces for autonomous platforms capable of being deployed in numbers. Spectre is engineered to integrate a wide range of mission systems and payloads.
Chartwell Marine has signed a Memorandum of Understanding with the Cooperative Association of Japan Shipbuilders, which represents 59 Japanese shipyards, to support the development and local construction of crew transfer vessels and service operation vessels for Japan’s offshore wind industry.
The agreement, signed in Tokyo in March, builds on collaboration between the two organisations that began in 2023, including a Nippon Foundation-supported programme that introduced Chartwell’s crew transfer and service operation vessel designs to the Japanese market. The association will act as a bridge between domestic shipowners, operators and yards, and Chartwell, facilitating knowledge exchange to support vessels in meeting project requirements and local content rules.
Hiroyuki Nishida, managing director of the association, said: “By working together, we can help support the development of locally constructed vessels and contribute to the long-term growth of the industry.”
Andy Page, managing director of Chartwell Marine, said: “We look forward to continuing to work closely with the association and Japanese stakeholders as the offshore wind sector scales up.”
These articles appeared in Insights, TNA May/June 2026
Nominate a colleague, a mentee or a friend for one of our prestiguous Naval Architecture Awards. Chosen by our Committees, the winners will be announced at our Annual Dinner attended by more than 300 maritime professionals, industry leaders and academics. Taking place on 28th May, this will be an evening of celebration at the historic De Vere Grand Connaught Rooms in London.
Nominations deadline: on 31st December. Award categories include Innovation, Safety and Diversity.