Fuel readiness and design consequences

The full article is available to our Members and registered users. If you are a Member, please sign in to continue reading. If you are not a Member, you can access 1 complimentary article this month by registering for a free account.

Become a Member to access the full range of RINA’s technical publications, articles and professional resources.

About Membership

Content Preview

When Deltamarin modelled the impact of a methanol transition on a vessel designed for conventional fuel operation, one finding was significant. Switching from diesel to methanol produced an approximately 30% reduction in available exhaust gas heat, sufficient to strand waste heat recovery equipment sized for a conventional thermal profile, shift operational dependency toward auxiliary boilers and, in acute cases, render advanced energy recovery systems economically unviable before the end of their design life.

 

The problem is in the heating system architecture: in the relationship between exhaust gas boilers, Organic Rankine Cycle units, steam turbines and the thermal assumptions embedded in the original design basis. It is straightforward to design around at the newbuilding stage but substantially more

Enter email address

Please enter your email address below and click the 'Log On' button.
If you already have a password enter it below.
If you do not have a password or can't remember it, leave it blank and we will email you an authentication code.
1 / 1
100%